Difference between revisions of "Talk:Turkish and Azerbaijani"
(comment) |
(Harmonization Issue) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Comitative Case |
Comitative Case |
||
The comitative case also should be modelled. Because it also goes inflected with the noun.--[[User:Msalperen|Msalperen]] 10:16, 18 August 2007 (BST) |
The comitative case also should be modelled. Because it also goes inflected with the noun.--[[User:Msalperen|Msalperen]] 10:16, 18 August 2007 (BST) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Harmonization Issue == |
||
| + | |||
| + | We can define <noun2> which ends with one kind of vowel (let's say e) and define new kinds of affixes (<sg2-2> for example) that only follows the second kind of nouns. would it be a solution for harmonization? There're are not so much type of vowels when it comes to harmonization. Let's say bira is a type 1 noun |
||
| + | |||
| + | biralarım = <noun-1><pl-1><sg1> |
||
| + | and evlerim <noun-2><pl-2><sg-2> |
||
| + | |||
| + | if the last vowel of the stem is a it will always be type 1 vowel, and the following affixes will always be type 1 and the same logic for the second type of nouns. Just in the xml file, we will define the word as noun-1 or noun-2 not only single identifier "<n>". I think this solution will require only a few more definitions or paradigms. --[[User:Msalperen|Msalperen]] 21:17, 18 August 2007 (BST) |
||
Revision as of 20:17, 18 August 2007
I think we will need new definitions for the five mentioned cases of turkish nouns
- tocase or tcase for short
- fromcase or fcase for short
- incase or icase for short
- thatcase or thcase for short
- purecase or pcase for short
Comparative Resources
A Comparison of Modern Azeri With By Kurtulush Oztopchu – Berkeley/UCLA
http://azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/13_folder/13_articles/kurtulush_azeri_turkish_13.pdf
Dictionary of the Turkic Languages:
Example for Noun cases:
http://www.ingilish.com/turkishnouncase.htm
The posession phrase part of this page also has some extra information with genitive and comitative forms http://www.ingilish.com/turkishpasttense.htm
Comitative Case The comitative case also should be modelled. Because it also goes inflected with the noun.--Msalperen 10:16, 18 August 2007 (BST)
Harmonization Issue
We can define <noun2> which ends with one kind of vowel (let's say e) and define new kinds of affixes (<sg2-2> for example) that only follows the second kind of nouns. would it be a solution for harmonization? There're are not so much type of vowels when it comes to harmonization. Let's say bira is a type 1 noun
biralarım = <noun-1><pl-1><sg1> and evlerim <noun-2><pl-2><sg-2>
if the last vowel of the stem is a it will always be type 1 vowel, and the following affixes will always be type 1 and the same logic for the second type of nouns. Just in the xml file, we will define the word as noun-1 or noun-2 not only single identifier "<n>". I think this solution will require only a few more definitions or paradigms. --Msalperen 21:17, 18 August 2007 (BST)
