Difference between revisions of "Talk:Turkish and Azerbaijani"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(comment) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The posession phrase part of this page also has some extra information with genitive and comitative forms |
The posession phrase part of this page also has some extra information with genitive and comitative forms |
||
http://www.ingilish.com/turkishpasttense.htm |
http://www.ingilish.com/turkishpasttense.htm |
||
| + | |||
| + | Comitative Case |
||
| + | The comitative case also should be modelled. Because it also goes inflected with the noun.--[[User:Msalperen|Msalperen]] 10:16, 18 August 2007 (BST) |
||
Revision as of 09:16, 18 August 2007
I think we will need new definitions for the five mentioned cases of turkish nouns
- tocase or tcase for short
- fromcase or fcase for short
- incase or icase for short
- thatcase or thcase for short
- purecase or pcase for short
Comparative Resources
A Comparison of Modern Azeri With By Kurtulush Oztopchu – Berkeley/UCLA
http://azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/13_folder/13_articles/kurtulush_azeri_turkish_13.pdf
Dictionary of the Turkic Languages:
Example for Noun cases:
http://www.ingilish.com/turkishnouncase.htm
The posession phrase part of this page also has some extra information with genitive and comitative forms http://www.ingilish.com/turkishpasttense.htm
Comitative Case The comitative case also should be modelled. Because it also goes inflected with the noun.--Msalperen 10:16, 18 August 2007 (BST)
