Difference between revisions of "Talk:Translation quality statistics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This page is great! It does not have to be scientifically proven, but it is very important for users to understand the quality of each pair. I would like to encourage you to fill in mo...) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I would like to encourage you to fill in more pairs, even if it does not have a paper reference... |
I would like to encourage you to fill in more pairs, even if it does not have a paper reference... |
||
| − | Thanks for your work! |
+ | Thanks for your work! {{unsigned|81.184.58.60}} |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :No problem, it is something that I've been meaning to do for quite a while. I'm sure we have statistics for more pairs out there, just need to add them. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 17:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:42, 29 October 2009
This page is great!
It does not have to be scientifically proven, but it is very important for users to understand the quality of each pair.
I would like to encourage you to fill in more pairs, even if it does not have a paper reference...
Thanks for your work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.184.58.60 (talk • contribs)
- No problem, it is something that I've been meaning to do for quite a while. I'm sure we have statistics for more pairs out there, just need to add them. - Francis Tyers 17:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
