Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apertium-quality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Menu) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [[Quality_control_framework/Installation|Installation]] |
* [[Quality_control_framework/Installation|Installation]] |
||
* [[Quality_control_framework/Usage|Usage]] |
* [[Quality_control_framework/Usage|Usage]] |
||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Quality_control_framework/Proposal|Proposal]] |
||
= Notes = |
= Notes = |
||
Revision as of 16:17, 22 May 2011
Menu
Notes
Week 1 — 25th April
- Must demonstrate that setuptools can allow a prefix-based installation for non-root users before end of bonding period
- Emailed Francis a written proof of setuptools adequately meeting expectations and requirements.
Week 2 — 2nd May
- Converted LaTeX source to Wikimedia format, and placed below this section for annotation.
- Completed example regtest.py
- Added Installation and Usage pages, uploaded initial files.
Week 3 — 9th May
- Fixed a Python regression-related bug in regtest.py
- Fixed a personal regression in setup.py
- Plan to add autogen.sh for config
- Consider using virtualenv for rootless installations
- Fixed installation instructions
- SVN and git now synched
Todo
- Complete the todo.
