Difference between revisions of "Lint"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TommiPirinen (talk | contribs) m (toc) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* don't use <code>lrx-proc</code> without the <code>-m</code> option. |
* don't use <code>lrx-proc</code> without the <code>-m</code> option. |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Monodix== |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Bidix== |
||
==Transfer== |
==Transfer== |
||
* when doing <code><clip></code>, check that the attribute listed in <code>part=""</code> is defined using a <code><def-attr></code>. |
* when doing <code><clip></code>, check that the attribute listed in <code>part=""</code> is defined using a <code><def-attr></code>. |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Modes== |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Tagger== |
||
==Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}== |
==Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}== |
||
Revision as of 07:44, 1 May 2016
Contents
Lexical selection
- don't use
lrx-procwithout the-moption.
Monodix
Bidix
Transfer
- when doing
<clip>, check that the attribute listed inpart=""is defined using a<def-attr>.
Modes
Tagger
Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}
This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:
- bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)
