Alternation
In some languages, in certain declensions part of the stem changes. This change may be completely regular, but at the moment we cannot model it nicely with Apertium monodices.
Example
Here is an example of umlaut in North Sámi, the plural forms with the exception of the nominative reduce the dipthong "uo" to "u". In Apertium dictionaris as they are, this would involve cutting the paradigm at "g". This substantially limits the generalisation power of paradigms.
guolli N+Sg+Nom guolli guolli N+Sg+Gen guoli guole guolli N+Sg+Acc guoli guolli N+Sg+Ill guollái guolli N+Sg+Loc guolis guolli N+Sg+Com guliin guolli N+Pl+Nom guolit guolli N+Pl+Gen guliid guolli N+Pl+Acc guliid guolli N+Pl+Ill guliide guolli N+Pl+Loc guliin guolli N+Pl+Com guliiguin
We can take care of this with over analysis, which would mean basically analysing both "uo" and "u" as valid for all declensions. For example:
<pardefs>
<pardef n="guol/li__n">
<e>
<p>
<l>li</l>
<r>li<s n="n"/><s n="sg"/><s n="nom"/></r>
</p>
</e>
...
</pardef>
<pardef n="u_uo">
<e><p><l>u</l><r>uo</r></p></e>
<e><p><l>uo</l><r>uo</r></p></e>
</pardef>
</pardefs>
<section id="main" type="standard">
<e lm="guolli">
<i>g</i><par n="u_uo"/><i>l</i>
<par n="guol/li__n"/>
</e>
</section>
This would over analyse, because gulli is not a valid form in the language.
guolli:guolli<n><sg><nom> gulli:guolli<n><sg><nom>
However, over analysis is ugly and it would be nice to have a way to restrict a change based on the following tags, discarding impossible paths. Taking care of this would probably involve both a change to the format of the dictionaries and to the analyser. We welcome suggestions!
