Scottish Gaelic and Irish

Todo

• Add all closed categories to the monolingual dictionaries.
• Perform an intersection on the monolingual dictionaries. (Making them consistent)
  • We only want stuff in the Irish analyser that we can translate into Scottish Gaelic -- so, in order for a word to be included, it should be in both the Irish monolingual, bilingual and the translation in the Scottish Gaelic monolingual. With the words for which we don't have translations we can just comment them out -- or move them to a separate file in dev/
• Do some fixing of the bilingual dictionary
  • Some restrictions probably need adding.
  • Some conjunctions are marked "cnj" and not subdivided for "cnjcoo", "cnjsub" etc.
• Write rules to do initial mutations for generation.
• Write some transfer rules.
  • For example to do tenses, number agreement, etc.

Initial mutations

As members of the group of Celtic languages, both Scottish Gaelic and Irish exhibit initial consonant mutation. There follows a brief description of how the analysis, disambiguation and generation of this phenomenon is dealt with in the apertium-ga-gd package.

Analysis

Analysis is taken care of by creating word-initial paradigms which simply replace the non-mutated forms with the mutated forms. For example for the initial consonant, 'b', which can be lenited as 'bh' or eclipsed as 'mb', we get the following initial mutation paradigm:

    <pardef n="initial-b">
      <e><p><l>b</l><r>b</r></p></e>
      <e><p><l>bh</l><r>b</r></p></e>
      <e><p><l>mb</l><r>b</r></p></e>
    </pardef>

This can then be applied to a word, e.g. "bulc" (), like:

    <e lm="bulc"><par n="initial-b"/><i>u</i><par n="bu/lc__n"/></e>

The initial mutation is 'b', and the word takes the bu/lc__n paradigm. The problem with this method is that sometimes it can cause "over analysis", but we can take care of this with disambiguation, see below.

Disambiguation

Disambiguation of initial-mutations can be done using constraint grammar (see the file apertium-ga-gd.ga-gd.rlx). The apertium-tagger is not useful for this purpose as it cannot look at surface forms of words, only lexical units. A trivial illustrative example of how the constraint grammar can be used is presented below. Lets say we want to choose between a feminine possessive determiner and a masculine possessive determiner based on the type of mutation exhibited by the following noun, for example in the following two phrases:

• a pheann, — his pen
• a haois — her age

Here the determiner, "a", can be either masculine or feminine (that is, "his" or "her"). So, if we have the following input to the constraint grammar:

  ^a/a<det><pos><p3><mf><pl>/a<det><pos><p3><m><sg>/a<det><pos><p3><f><sg>$ ^pheann/peann<n><m><sg><nom>/peann<n><m><pl><gen>$
  ^a/a<det><pos><p3><mf><pl>/a<det><pos><p3><m><sg>/a<det><pos><p3><f><sg>$ ^haois/aois<n><f><sg><nom>$ 

So, first we define what we want to work with,

LIST DetPos = (det pos);             # possessive determiner

LIST hPro = ("<h.*>"r "[aeiou].*"r); # h-prothesis
LIST Len = ("<ph.*>"r "p.*"r);       # lenition

SET DetPosF = DetPos | (f);          # feminine possessive determiner
SET DetPosM = DetPos | (m);          # masculine possessive determiner

This should be fairly straightforward, then we write rules that say "Choose the feminine possessive when the noun that follows is subject to h-prothesis, and the masculine possessive when the noun that follows is subject to lenition",

SELECT DetPosF IF (1 hPro);
SELECT DetPosM IF (1 Len);

Applying this grammar gives:

  ^a<det><pos><p3><m><sg>$ ^peann<n><m><sg><nom>$ 
  ^a<det><pos><p3><f><sg>$ ^oíche<n><f><sg><nom>$ 

The desired result.

Generation

Overview

Generation of initial mutations takes place in two files, where $x$ is the code of the language that is being generated (ga for Irish, gd for Scottish Gaelic).

• apertium-ga-gd.pre-$x$.t1x — Transfer rules which add tags defining the mutation to the beginning of words which should be mutated.
• apertium-ga-gd.muta-$x$.dix — A post-generation dictionary which takes the tag and the initial letter of the word and outputs the mutated form.

For example, when translating the phrase "do theach" (your house) from Irish to Scottish Gaelic, the result will be do thaigh (where the initial mutation is marked by an underscore). The output of apertium-transfer will be:

  ^do<det><pos><p2><mf><sg>$ ^taigh<n><m><sg><nom>$ 

This is then passed through apertium-ga-gd.pre-gd, which adds a tag, <l1> for lenition.

  ^do<det><pos><p2><mf><sg>$ ^<l1>$^taigh<n><m><sg><nom>$ 

The morphological generator then outputs the surface forms of the words, and appends an "alarm" signal to the mutation tag.

  do ~<l1>taigh

Finally, the mutation dictionary, apertium-ga-gd.muta-gd.dix, replaces the string ~<l1>t with 'th', which is the lenited form of 't'.

  do thaigh

apertium-ga-gd.pre-$x$.t1x

As mentioned above, the input to this stage is:

  ^do<det><pos><p2><mf><sg>$ ^taigh<n><m><sg><nom>$ 

A simplified (although functioning) rule in this file might look something like:

<pattern>
  <pattern-item n="det"/>
  <pattern-item n="nom"/>
</pattern>
<choose> 
  <when> <!-- When the lemma of the determiner is "do", 
              apply lenition to the following noun -->
    <test>
      <equal>
        <clip pos="1" side="tl" part="lem"/>
        <lit v="do"/>
      </equal>
     </test>
     <out>
      <lu><clip pos="1" side="tl" part="whole"/></lu>
      <b/>
      <lu><lit-tag v="l1"/></lu>    <!-- Lenition -->
      <lu><clip pos="2" side="tl" part="whole"/></lu>
    </out>
  </when>
</choose>

And the output will be,

  ^do<det><pos><p2><mf><sg>$ ^<l1>$^taigh<n><m><sg><nom>$ 

apertium-ga-gd.muta-$x$.dix

The input to this stage is:

  do ~<l1>taigh

The "rule", or rather "entry" in the mutation dictionary will look like:

    <e>
      <p>
        <l><a/><s n="l1"/>t</l>
        <r>th</r>
      </p>
      <par n="alphabet"/> 
    </e>

Here, the alphabet is defined as a paradigm which for any given input letter, just outputs the letter unchanged. So this basically says,

"When we have the alarm symbol '~', followed by a tag indicating lenition followed by a 't' and then any alphabetic character, output 'th' followed by the next character"

The output of this stage is a correctly mutated phrase,

  do thaigh

Testing

• /Regression tests
• /Pending tests

See also

• Scottish Gaelic

External links

• E. Uí Dhonnchadha and J. Van Genabith (2006) "A Part-of-speech tagger for Irish using Finite-State Morphology and Constraint Grammar Disambiguation".
• Wikipedia: Differences between Scottish Gaelic and Irish
• Comparison of Irish and Scottish Gaelic
• Faclair Gàidhlig-Gaeilge