Difference between revisions of "Talk:Welsh to English"
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
===="was"==== |
===="was"==== |
||
"roedd" ([he/she/it] was) is unknown, but I seem to remember adding entries for "to be" to the dixes in the mists of time. Was I dreaming? |
"roedd" ([he/she/it] was) is unknown, but I seem to remember adding entries for "to be" to the dixes in the mists of time. Was I dreaming? (roedd <- yr + oedd) |
||
;the boy was in the garden -> *y bachgen bu yn yr ardd - bu'r bachgen yn yr ardd |
;the boy was in the garden -> *y bachgen bu yn yr ardd - bu'r bachgen yn yr ardd |
||
Almost correct, except for word-order, and the fact that the preterite is being used instead of the imperfect ("roedd y bachgen yn yr ardd"). The preterite needs to be marked as only being used in written Welsh, and to have a lower likelihood than the imperfect. This is too rough a rule, but would do for the time being. |
Almost correct, except for word-order, and the fact that the preterite is being used instead of the imperfect ("roedd y bachgen yn yr ardd"). The preterite needs to be marked as only being used in written Welsh, and to have a lower likelihood than the imperfect. This is too rough a rule, but would do for the time being. |
||
====Marking and word-order==== |
|||
The above brings up a useful point about this. If the standard VSO sequence is changed to SVO (ie unchanged from the English standard), this is a marked pattern, conveying a relative clause. In written Welsh, the verb will be preceded by "a" + soft mutation, but in spoken Welsh the "a" usually disappears. |
|||
; y bachgen [a] fu yn yr ardd ddydd Llun (the boy who was in the garden on Monday) |
|||
; yr eneth [a] welodd y ci (the girl who saw the dog) |
|||
contrast |
|||
; gwelodd yr eneth y ci (the girl saw the dog) |
|||
Hmmm. Relative clauses are going to be difficult. |
|||
For Welsh pattern "noun + a + soft-mutated_verb" |
|||
output "noun + who/which + verb". |
|||
Revision as of 11:18, 26 June 2008
English to Welsh
Macros
- This will contain chunks of rules that we need to split out to make them more maintainable
Patterns
Determiner Adjective Noun
When the determiner is indefinite, output noun + adjective When the determiner is definite, output determiner + noun + adjective.
- Tests
(1) A red cat
- coch cath
(2) The red cat
- Y coch cath
Notes for areas to be covered
A sort of scratchpad / todo list, based on things that come up when putting phrases into the testing webform.
Conjunctive genitive
- gwallt yr eneth - *hair the girl - the hair of the girl - the girl's hair
- llaw y bachgen - *hand the boy - the hand of the boy - the boy's hand
Note that the noun phrase in English is definite - contrast "merch y meddyg" (the doctor's daughter) and "merch meddyg" (a doctor's daughter).
For an English phrase of the type "def + noun1 + of + def + noun2" or of the type "def + noun2 + 's + noun1" convert in Welsh to "noun1 + def + noun2".
- Here can noun1 be a simple noun, or can it be a noun phrase? For example "the red cat of the young boy" - Francis Tyers
- e.g.
- For the pattern det.def + noun1 + of + det.def + noun2:
- Output noun1 + det.def + noun2
- For the pattern det.def + noun1 + of + det.def + noun2:
- Yes, as long as you like, eg,
- cath goch bachgen bach merch ifanc bert rheolwr y banc mawr du
- the red cat of the little boy of the pretty young daughter of the manager of the big black bank
- It's only the last NP of the sequence that gets the def.det. Donnek
For a Welsh phrase of the type "!det + noun1 + def + noun2" convert in English to "def + noun1 + of + def + noun2" or to "def + noun2 + 's + noun1".
The second noun is probably historically a genitive, but it has lost all case markers. The equivalent in Irish would be:
- ceann an chapaill - *head the of-horse (gen) - the head of the horse - the horse's head
- ceann capaill - *head of-horse (gen) - the head of a horse - a horse's head
"is"
- the boy is in the garden -> *y bachgen bae yn yr ardd
transfer is getting the 3p sing form OK (mae), but proc is unmutating it (mae -> bae).
The verb needs to be moved to the front of the sentence as well, of course.
- mae'r bachgen yn yr ardd -> *arethe boy in the garden
proc is missing a space somewhere, and the 3p sing info gets lost between pretransfer and transfer.
Word order again.
"was"
"roedd" ([he/she/it] was) is unknown, but I seem to remember adding entries for "to be" to the dixes in the mists of time. Was I dreaming? (roedd <- yr + oedd)
- the boy was in the garden -> *y bachgen bu yn yr ardd - bu'r bachgen yn yr ardd
Almost correct, except for word-order, and the fact that the preterite is being used instead of the imperfect ("roedd y bachgen yn yr ardd"). The preterite needs to be marked as only being used in written Welsh, and to have a lower likelihood than the imperfect. This is too rough a rule, but would do for the time being.
Marking and word-order
The above brings up a useful point about this. If the standard VSO sequence is changed to SVO (ie unchanged from the English standard), this is a marked pattern, conveying a relative clause. In written Welsh, the verb will be preceded by "a" + soft mutation, but in spoken Welsh the "a" usually disappears.
- y bachgen [a] fu yn yr ardd ddydd Llun (the boy who was in the garden on Monday)
- yr eneth [a] welodd y ci (the girl who saw the dog)
contrast
- gwelodd yr eneth y ci (the girl saw the dog)
Hmmm. Relative clauses are going to be difficult.
For Welsh pattern "noun + a + soft-mutated_verb" output "noun + who/which + verb".
"i" as preposition
Welsh "i" (to) is getting translated as "[f]i" (I, me).
if Welsh "i" occurs immediately after a verb marked as 1 p sing output pronoun 1p sing otherwise output preposition "to"