Difference between revisions of "Talk:Translation quality statistics"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: This page is great! It does not have to be scientifically proven, but it is very important for users to understand the quality of each pair. I would like to encourage you to fill in mo...)
 
 
Line 5: Line 5:
I would like to encourage you to fill in more pairs, even if it does not have a paper reference...
I would like to encourage you to fill in more pairs, even if it does not have a paper reference...


Thanks for your work!
Thanks for your work! {{unsigned|81.184.58.60}}


:No problem, it is something that I've been meaning to do for quite a while. I'm sure we have statistics for more pairs out there, just need to add them. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 17:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:42, 29 October 2009

This page is great!

It does not have to be scientifically proven, but it is very important for users to understand the quality of each pair.

I would like to encourage you to fill in more pairs, even if it does not have a paper reference...

Thanks for your work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.184.58.60 (talkcontribs)


No problem, it is something that I've been meaning to do for quite a while. I'm sure we have statistics for more pairs out there, just need to add them. - Francis Tyers 17:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)