Difference between revisions of "Promotion HQ"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:


* Danish <-> Swedish <-> Norwegian Bokmål <-> Norwegian Nynorsk <-> Icelandic <-> Faroese (North-Germanic dialect continuum)
* Danish <-> Swedish <-> Norwegian Bokmål <-> Norwegian Nynorsk <-> Icelandic <-> Faroese (North-Germanic dialect continuum)

::Between Nynorsk and Bokmål there exists a proprietary implementation, [http://www.nynodata.no/index.htm Nynodata], some discussion [http://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brukardiskusjon:Trondtr here]
:: see [[North Germanic languages]]
::Fran made a dictionary for Faroese: [http://xixona.dlsi.ua.es/~fran/faroese/index.php here] (neither Icelandic nor Faroese are EU official)

* Czech <-> Slovak
* Czech <-> Slovak
* Slovenian <-> Serbo-Croatian <-> Macedonian <-> Bulgarian (South-Slavic dialect continuum)
* Slovenian <-> Serbo-Croatian <-> Macedonian <-> Bulgarian (South-Slavic dialect continuum)

Revision as of 12:34, 25 April 2009

Some ideas for expanding and promoting Apertium, like a scratchpad or something.

Ideas for papers

  • The use of lttoolbox to develop analysers for under-resourced languages (e.g. Welsh/Afrikaans ...)
  • Retrieving bilingual dictionary entries using Wikipedia interwiki links.
  • On pragmatic dealing with MWEs
  • On Spanish-French, Catalan-French
  • On apertium-2/3 transfer

Ideal pairs for development

These pairs are ideal for development due to the closeness of the languages in question, or historical connection. Some are closer than others, but all are pretty close.

European Union official languages

  • Danish <-> Swedish <-> Norwegian Bokmål <-> Norwegian Nynorsk <-> Icelandic <-> Faroese (North-Germanic dialect continuum)
see North Germanic languages
  • Czech <-> Slovak
  • Slovenian <-> Serbo-Croatian <-> Macedonian <-> Bulgarian (South-Slavic dialect continuum)
  • Afrikaans <-> Dutch
  • Irish <-> Scots Gaelic — Kevin Scannell already has a system, but it could be Apertiumised.
see Scottish Gaelic and Irish
  • Finnish <-> Estonian (Balto-Finnic, with agglutinative morphology)
  • Romanian <-> Aromanian
  • Romanian <-> Italian
  • Italian <-> Neapolitan <-> Piedmontese <-> Friulian
  • English <-> Scots/Ulster Scots (Scots might benefit in some way like Occitan from the standardisation effort as described in Mikel's LREC paper) — the SLC may have funds.

Non-EU

  • Hindi <-> Urdu
  • Persian <-> Tajik
  • Northern Sotho <-> Sotho
  • Turkish <-> Azerbaijani <-> Turkmen <-> Tatar (Southwestern-Turkic, Oghuz dialect continuum)
  • Uyghur <-> Uzbek
  • Russian <-> Ukrainian <-> Belarusian (East-Slavic dialect continuum)
  • Dungan <-> Mandarin (not that many people speak Dungan)
  • Indonesian <-> Malaysian
  • Xhosa <-> Zulu
  • North Sámi <-> Lule Sámi
see North Sámi and Lule Sámi

Large pairs for which we should have something

These pairs are not really close, but are important languages.

  • Italian <-> French
  • Dutch <-> German
  • Italian <-> Spanish

See also