Difference between revisions of "User:Popcorndude/Recursive Transfer/Progress"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Popcorndude (talk | contribs) |
Popcorndude (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Conjoined lexical units - just treat as consecutive elements with no blank between? |
* Conjoined lexical units - just treat as consecutive elements with no blank between? |
||
* Syntax for mapping between sets of tags (e.g. <o3pl> -> <p3><pl>, <o3sg> -> <p3><sg>) |
* Syntax for mapping between sets of tags (e.g. <o3pl> -> <p3><pl>, <o3sg> -> <p3><sg>) |
||
* Conditional output (e.g. modal verbs in English) |
|||
== Week 1 == |
== Week 1 == |
||
Revision as of 16:58, 9 May 2019
Contents
Community Bonding
Todo list
- Determine exact semantics of lexical unit tag-matching
- Are they ordered?
- Are they consecutive?
- See if anyone has input on formalism syntax in general
- Mechanism for clitic-insertion
- e.g. V2, Wackernagel
- Read about GLR parser algorithms
- Find reading materials
- Is there anything that can be done to make this finite-state? (probably not)
- Should we just start with the naive implementation (what the Python script does) as a baseline?
- Conjoined lexical units - just treat as consecutive elements with no blank between?
- Syntax for mapping between sets of tags (e.g. <o3pl> -> <p3><pl>, <o3sg> -> <p3><sg>)
- Conditional output (e.g. modal verbs in English)
