Difference between revisions of "Talk:Turkish and Azerbaijani"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
http://books.google.com/books?id=2f3yxBxf1TYC&pg=PA1&dq=turkic+dictionary&ei=u6bGRobjCI_g6wKSs-XfDw&sig=KmHmuF4VK5oc30rFxkBOHyuY0eg
http://books.google.com/books?id=2f3yxBxf1TYC&pg=PA1&dq=turkic+dictionary&ei=u6bGRobjCI_g6wKSs-XfDw&sig=KmHmuF4VK5oc30rFxkBOHyuY0eg


http://tdk.org.tr/lehceler/


Example for Noun cases:
Example for Noun cases:

Revision as of 09:59, 20 August 2007

I think we will need new definitions for the five mentioned cases of turkish nouns

  • tocase or tcase for short
  • fromcase or fcase for short
  • incase or icase for short
  • thatcase or thcase for short
  • purecase or pcase for short


Comparative Resources

A Comparison of Modern Azeri With By Kurtulush Oztopchu – Berkeley/UCLA

http://azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/13_folder/13_articles/kurtulush_azeri_turkish_13.pdf

Dictionary of the Turkic Languages:

http://books.google.com/books?id=2f3yxBxf1TYC&pg=PA1&dq=turkic+dictionary&ei=u6bGRobjCI_g6wKSs-XfDw&sig=KmHmuF4VK5oc30rFxkBOHyuY0eg

http://tdk.org.tr/lehceler/

Example for Noun cases:

http://www.ingilish.com/turkishnouncase.htm

The posession phrase part of this page also has some extra information with genitive and comitative forms http://www.ingilish.com/turkishpasttense.htm

Comitative Case The comitative case also should be modelled. Because it also goes inflected with the noun.--Msalperen 10:16, 18 August 2007 (BST)

http://www.turkishlanguage.co.uk/fiilkipi.htm http://www.practicalturkish.com/turkish-verb--literature.html

Azeri Vowel and Consonant Harmony: http://home.unilang.org/wiki3/index.php/Azeri_vowel_and_consonant_harmony

Harmonization Issue

We can define <noun-2> which ends with one kind of vowel (let's say e) and define new kinds of affixes (<sg2-2> for example) that only follows the second kind of nouns. would it be a solution for harmonization? There're are not so much type of vowels when it comes to harmonization. In order not to confuse noun2 with noun-2 as already seen we can use a dash (-) sign. Let's say bira is a type 1 noun and lar is the first form of plural maker. It's obvious to us that pl-1 will never follow noun-1 however, we can define noun-1 in the dictionary so:

  • biralarım = <noun-1><pl-1><sg1>
  • and ev is the second type
  • evlerim=<noun-2><pl-2><sg-2>
  • There are 8 vowels and only two kinds of plural makers in Turkish so it would be
  • for a,ı,o and u (so called tight vowels)
  • stems: bira, koro, kız, muz
  • biralarım = <noun-1><pl-1><p1> (my beers)
  • korolarım = <noun-1><pl-1><p1> (my choirs)
  • kızlarım = <noun-1><pl-1><p1> (my daughters)
  • muzlarım = <noun-1><pl-1><p1> (my bananas)

for e,i,ö, and ü (so called "tin" vowels)

  • stems: ev, kedi, göz, düş
  • evlerim = <noun-2><pl-2><p-1>
  • kedilerim = <noun-2><pl-2><p-1>
  • gözlerim = <noun-2><pl-2><p-1>
  • düşlerim = <noun-2><pl-2><p-1>

if the last vowel of the stem is a it will always be type 1 vowel, and the following affixes will always be type 1 and the same logic for the second type of nouns. Just in the xml file, we will define the word as noun-1 or noun-2 not only single identifier "<n>". I think this solution will require only a few more definitions or paradigms. --Msalperen 21:17, 18 August 2007 (BST)

Okey... This won't suffice if <noun-1> corresponds to <noun-2> in second language??? confused.--Msalperen 22:18, 18 August 2007 (BST)


List of symbols

  • present continuous = pres.cont
  • simple present = pres
  • future = ffi
  • definite past = dpt
  • indefinite past = ipt