Search results

* HFST is best for languages with agglutinative morphology and/or complicated morphophonology. ...ox is the more default and common one, but if a language has agglutinative morphology, or any amount of productive morphophonology (especially vowel harmony), th

Basque morphology is complex and owing to its agglutinative character, much of the standard free software for dealing with morphology (such as ispell, aspell and hunspell) is

...| Standard verb || shortened form of vblex, often used in agglutinative languages || VERB == Inflectional morphology == <!-- infl -->

1. Bidix: the bidix is quite vast. 8000 words are actually a lot of words for agglutinative languages. We set our goal at 10.000 words, which was too much for a langua ...translated well, with most of 20% of mistakes consisting of azmorph wrong morphology makes me think that the CG works quite well, given that in some cases a wro

...e languages yet), we're going to work on one with simpler and less regular morphology. We particularly encourage people to use lttoolbox wherever possible; it ha ...up into the file, and this gives the outline of our the main parts of our morphology: the alphabet (used for tokenisation); the symbols (or ''tags''), which giv

*[http://www.mt-archive.info/MTS-2001-Mahsut.pdf Utilizing Agglutinative Features in Japanese-Uighur Machine Translation] ...tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi YÖK] Thesis #290286: Description of tatar morphology and a Tatar-Turkish machine translation system / Tatarcanın morfolojisinin

* Finnish <-> Estonian (Balto-Finnic, with [[agglutinative morphology]])

...nsducers (the Sámi languages we analyse have all to much non-concatenative morphology to be treated with such methods). We use Xerox tools, but the open-source