Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limited rule-based lexical selection"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==CG== Wouldn't a MAP rule be more fitting? Since you're not actually substituting anything?)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==CG==
 
==CG==
 
Wouldn't a MAP rule be more fitting? Since you're not actually substituting anything?
 
Wouldn't a MAP rule be more fitting? Since you're not actually substituting anything?
  +
  +
:The problem is that the tag needs to go just after the POS tag, not at the end of the list. But otherwise yes. :) - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 09:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:08, 10 September 2009

CG[edit]

Wouldn't a MAP rule be more fitting? Since you're not actually substituting anything?

The problem is that the tag needs to go just after the POS tag, not at the end of the list. But otherwise yes. :) - Francis Tyers 09:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)