Difference between revisions of "Talk:Documentation of Matxin 1.0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: "The chunk can be thought of as a phrase but always as the output of the analyser, and the node to the word, however taking into account that multiwords." ...what?) |
m (Francis Tyers moved page Talk:Documentation of Matxin to Talk:Documentation of Matxin 1.0) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "The chunk can be thought of as a phrase but always as the output of the analyser, and the node to the word, however taking into account that multiwords." ...what? |
+ | "The chunk can be thought of as a phrase but always as the output of the analyser, and the node to the word, however taking into account that multiwords." ...what? {{unsigned|Unhammer}} |
| + | |||
| + | :"El chunk se puede asimilar al sintagma pero siempre en función de la salida del analizador, y el nodo a palabra, pero teniendo en cuenta que también hay unidades multipalabra." |
||
| + | |||
| + | :Well caught. This is badly translated. Better would be: "A chunk can encompass a phrase, but always depending on the the output of the analyser, and a node can encompass a word, but taking into account that some words can be multiword units". - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 16:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 11:11, 14 May 2016
"The chunk can be thought of as a phrase but always as the output of the analyser, and the node to the word, however taking into account that multiwords." ...what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unhammer (talk • contribs)
- "El chunk se puede asimilar al sintagma pero siempre en función de la salida del analizador, y el nodo a palabra, pero teniendo en cuenta que también hay unidades multipalabra."
- Well caught. This is badly translated. Better would be: "A chunk can encompass a phrase, but always depending on the the output of the analyser, and a node can encompass a word, but taking into account that some words can be multiword units". - Francis Tyers 16:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
