Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corpus-based lexicalised definiteness"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'shouldn't this be useful even when only one language expresses definiteness? (e.g. sme-nob)')
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
shouldn't this be useful even when only one language expresses definiteness? (e.g. sme-nob)
+
shouldn't this be useful even when only one language expresses definiteness? (e.g. sme-nob) -- [[User:Unhammer|Unhammer]]
  +
  +
:Yes definitely! (soz) - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 07:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:39, 16 February 2012

shouldn't this be useful even when only one language expresses definiteness? (e.g. sme-nob) -- Unhammer

Yes definitely! (soz) - Francis Tyers 07:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)