Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apertium logo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* Does not convey translation. |
* Does not convey translation. |
||
* Could be modified so that some words seem to enter in a language and get out in other languages. Entering / getting out could be confused, no problem (bidirectional). |
* Could be modified so that some words seem to enter in a language and get out in other languages. Entering / getting out could be confused, no problem (bidirectional). |
||
| + | |||
| + | ===Black & white=== |
||
| + | |||
| + | * I like the second one down. But could do with more colour. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 22:11, 19 August 2007 (BST) |
||
Revision as of 21:11, 19 August 2007
Please feel free to list your comments and suggests regarding each proposal below, remember to sign with ~~~~.
Comments and suggestions
Speak thru me
- Anonymous has commented, "the facing persons are not talking just staring at each other".
Apertium's got balls
- Anonymous has commented, "the red on white text does not read well".
- Anonymous commented, "looks too much like a strepsils advert"
- Looks too much like an analgesic advert. --Aimaz 19:44, 19 August 2007 (BST)
Corporativa generica
- Easily defaceable with an 'r'. Not the message we want to send.
Open window/door
- Anonymous has commented, "the window one has a good idea behind it, but it wasn't implemented right, so it just looks like a picture and not a logo".
Open box
- It has been said that it is "too wikipedia".
- Does not convey translation.
- Could be modified so that some words seem to enter in a language and get out in other languages. Entering / getting out could be confused, no problem (bidirectional).
Black & white
- I like the second one down. But could do with more colour. - Francis Tyers 22:11, 19 August 2007 (BST)
