Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apertium for Dummies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::That's what I said. "How Apertium Works" could be a better idea (you may replace what I wrote there). Also, we will need this to be updated. Simplifying this overview may actually cause inaccuracies and claiming that it's "for Dummies" isn't a good idea usually. [[User:Wei2912|Wei2912]] ([[User talk:Wei2912|talk]]) 13:27, 1 December 2013 (GMT) |
::That's what I said. "How Apertium Works" could be a better idea (you may replace what I wrote there). Also, we will need this to be updated. Simplifying this overview may actually cause inaccuracies and claiming that it's "for Dummies" isn't a good idea usually. [[User:Wei2912|Wei2912]] ([[User talk:Wei2912|talk]]) 13:27, 1 December 2013 (GMT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :A real for dummies would perhaps be too basic? Or like this: |
||
| + | |||
| + | / -- new word order etc --> |
||
| + | analysis / --> generate |
||
| + | / \ -- translate words --> \ |
||
| + | / \ |
||
| + | input text output text |
||
| + | |||
| + | :The mt triangle, that is (!) [[User:Trondtr|Trondtr]] ([[User talk:Trondtr|talk]]) 13:30, 1 December 2013 (GMT). |
||
Revision as of 13:30, 1 December 2013
For Dummies
Quoting a reader: "to say the truth, that isn't apertium for dummies". Well, "Apertium -- an overview" would perhaps be better. But then the dummies page, how to write it? Trondtr (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2013 (GMT)
- That's what I said. "How Apertium Works" could be a better idea (you may replace what I wrote there). Also, we will need this to be updated. Simplifying this overview may actually cause inaccuracies and claiming that it's "for Dummies" isn't a good idea usually. Wei2912 (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2013 (GMT)
- A real for dummies would perhaps be too basic? Or like this:
/ -- new word order etc -->
analysis / --> generate
/ \ -- translate words --> \
/ \
input text output text
