Difference between revisions of "Quality control framework/XML Schema"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<statistics type="apertium" version="1.0"> |
<statistics type="apertium" version="1.0"> |
||
<regressions> |
<regressions> |
||
| − | <regression |
+ | <regression timestamp="2011-05-24T23:48:58.393974"> |
| + | <title>Breton and French/Regression tests</title> |
||
| − | <name>Example</name> |
||
| + | <revision>23172</revision> |
||
| − | <checksum type="sha1">dcbc8f63b06c899b9db957f0e03466860fce8056</checksum> |
||
| − | <passes> |
+ | <passes>380</passes> |
| − | <fails> |
+ | <fails>76</fails> |
| + | <total>456</total> |
||
</regression> |
</regression> |
||
</regressions> |
</regressions> |
||
</statistics> |
</statistics> |
||
| − | |||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
Revision as of 13:47, 24 May 2011
The XML Schema doesn't exist yet for statistics, but here's the example so far.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<statistics type="apertium" version="1.0">
<regressions>
<regression timestamp="2011-05-24T23:48:58.393974">
<title>Breton and French/Regression tests</title>
<revision>23172</revision>
<passes>380</passes>
<fails>76</fails>
<total>456</total>
</regression>
</regressions>
</statistics>
