PMC proposals/Move apertium to github

From Apertium
< PMC proposals
Revision as of 13:53, 6 September 2013 by Leftmostcat (talk | contribs) (Add draft git proposal)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Summary

git provides a large number of advantages over subversion, including a very good branching mechanism, offline commit history, a bisection tool for locating broken commits, and excellent merge/rebase capabilities. Making use of a service such as github would also allow for each apertium module to be in a separate repository, with the possibility for creating central repositories (such as incubator) which link to all of the included modules. github also provides an issue tracker and a system for making commits in a personal fork of the upstream repository, then requesting that your changes be pulled into upstream. Sourceforge could be retained for mailing lists and similar services.

Migration from subversion to git should be relatively simple. Tools exist for creating git repositories from subversion while retaining all commit history. The migration should begin with smaller apertium modules, such as the contents of nursery and incubator. The more central modules, such as lttoolbox and apertium itself, can be moved last. Documentation can be updated, but a simple guide similar to https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/GitHowTo should be sufficient. Much of the information contained therein is probably not necessary for apertium workflow, making for a simpler, easier-to-write document. For more complex requirements, the existing git documentation is excellent and there are many resources for a variety of git recipes.

Proposed by: User:Leftmostcat

In detail

Caveats

Comments

Voting