Difference between revisions of "Northern Sámi and Norwegian/semtags"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The sme lexc has a lot of semantic tags like Sem/Foo Sem/Bar etc. In the apertiumised lexc, cg and bidix, they look like sem_foo and sem_bar. For some reason, they sometimes ...")
 
 
Line 14: Line 14:
   
 
^Gonagas<n><sg><nom><@VOC>$
 
^Gonagas<n><sg><nom><@VOC>$
  +
 
This means we get an @ from bidix instead of "konge".
+
This means we get an @Gonagas from bidix instead of "konge".

Latest revision as of 11:50, 13 June 2014

The sme lexc has a lot of semantic tags like Sem/Foo Sem/Bar etc. In the apertiumised lexc, cg and bidix, they look like sem_foo and sem_bar.

For some reason, they sometimes disappear in CG.

Here's the output of the analyser, this is what the bidix expects:

^Gonagas/gonagas<n><sem_hum><sg><nom>$

Here's the output of mor.rlx.bin, this suddenly has a strange <←sme→> tag:

^Gonagas/gonagas<n><←sme→><sem_hum><sg><nom>$

Here's the output of syn.rlx.bin, where both the strange tag and the sem-tag are missing:

^Gonagas<n><sg><nom><@VOC>$

This means we get an @Gonagas from bidix instead of "konge".