Difference between revisions of "Northern Sámi and Norwegian/semtags"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The sme lexc has a lot of semantic tags like Sem/Foo Sem/Bar etc. In the apertiumised lexc, cg and bidix, they look like sem_foo and sem_bar. For some reason, they sometimes ...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 11:50, 13 June 2014
The sme lexc has a lot of semantic tags like Sem/Foo Sem/Bar etc. In the apertiumised lexc, cg and bidix, they look like sem_foo and sem_bar.
For some reason, they sometimes disappear in CG.
Here's the output of the analyser, this is what the bidix expects:
^Gonagas/gonagas<n><sem_hum><sg><nom>$
Here's the output of mor.rlx.bin, this suddenly has a strange <←sme→> tag:
^Gonagas/gonagas<n><←sme→><sem_hum><sg><nom>$
Here's the output of syn.rlx.bin, where both the strange tag and the sem-tag are missing:
^Gonagas<n><sg><nom><@VOC>$
This means we get an @ from bidix instead of "konge".