Difference between revisions of "Morphological analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: '''Morphological analysis''' attempts to model the rules that govern the internal structure of words in a language. For example, speakers of English realise that the words "dog" and "dogs...) |
ScoopGracie (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Analyse morphologique|En français]] |
||
| + | |||
'''Morphological analysis''' attempts to model the rules that govern the internal structure of words in a language. For example, speakers of English realise that the words "dog" and "dogs" are related, that "dogs" is to "dog" as "cats" is to "cat". The rules understood by the speaker reflect specific patterns and regularities in the way in which words are formed from smaller units and how those smaller units interact. |
'''Morphological analysis''' attempts to model the rules that govern the internal structure of words in a language. For example, speakers of English realise that the words "dog" and "dogs" are related, that "dogs" is to "dog" as "cats" is to "cat". The rules understood by the speaker reflect specific patterns and regularities in the way in which words are formed from smaller units and how those smaller units interact. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Another way to understand it is splitting a source language word into its lemma and grammatical info. |
||
| + | * cats -> cat<n><pl> |
||
| + | * dog -> dog<n><sg> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Surface form]] and [[lexical form]] |
* [[Surface form]] and [[lexical form]] |
||
| + | * [[Part-of-speech tagging]] |
||
| + | * [[Morphological dictionaries]] |
||
[[Category:Terminology]] |
[[Category:Terminology]] |
||
| + | [[Category:Documentation in English]] |
||
Latest revision as of 01:29, 13 April 2020
Morphological analysis attempts to model the rules that govern the internal structure of words in a language. For example, speakers of English realise that the words "dog" and "dogs" are related, that "dogs" is to "dog" as "cats" is to "cat". The rules understood by the speaker reflect specific patterns and regularities in the way in which words are formed from smaller units and how those smaller units interact.
Another way to understand it is splitting a source language word into its lemma and grammatical info.
- cats -> cat<n><pl>
- dog -> dog<n><sg>
