Difference between revisions of "Lsx module report"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Project description== ==Statistics== ==Future work==") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Future work== |
==Future work== |
||
| + | * 10:53 firespeaker: pektii: if we offload multiwords from the transducers to lsx, (1) how do we do N N compounds with lsx? (2) how does translation *to* a multiword work? |
||
| + | * recycling dictionaries and/or paradigms? lsx-dictionaries are packaged in language pairs. the eng-spa lsx-dictionary can mostly be reaped by eng-cat. could we make use of the similarity? |
||
| + | * Support for language pairs: we haven't gotten much extensive beta testing. The following are language pairs that have packaged the lsx-module: |
||
| + | ** eng-cat |
||
| + | ** eng-deu (?) |
||
Revision as of 00:45, 29 August 2017
Project description
Statistics
Future work
- 10:53 firespeaker: pektii: if we offload multiwords from the transducers to lsx, (1) how do we do N N compounds with lsx? (2) how does translation *to* a multiword work?
- recycling dictionaries and/or paradigms? lsx-dictionaries are packaged in language pairs. the eng-spa lsx-dictionary can mostly be reaped by eng-cat. could we make use of the similarity?
- Support for language pairs: we haven't gotten much extensive beta testing. The following are language pairs that have packaged the lsx-module:
- eng-cat
- eng-deu (?)
