Difference between revisions of "Kazakh and Tatar/Diary"
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
; Checking & refactoring clitics |
; Checking & refactoring clitics |
||
| − | Some of the clitics appear only after certain forms (e.g. "шы<mod_foc>" in Kazakh, which expresses politeness, joins only 2nd person singular). And vice versa - some of the forms can get only certain clitics (imperative forms get only "чы" and "сана" in Tatar |
+ | Some of the clitics appear only after certain forms (e.g. "шы<mod_foc>" in Kazakh, which expresses politeness, joins only 2nd person singular). And vice versa - some of the forms can get only certain clitics (imperative forms get only "чы" and "сана" in Tatar) |
I moved the above clitics into a separate lexicon, and linked imperative forms to it, so that there is no overgeneration now (and a bit easier life for spectie's "testvocing" PC's). |
I moved the above clitics into a separate lexicon, and linked imperative forms to it, so that there is no overgeneration now (and a bit easier life for spectie's "testvocing" PC's). |
||
In Tatar some new clitics were added as well. |
In Tatar some new clitics were added as well. |
||
| + | |||
| + | === Monday, 28th May 2012 === |
||
| + | |||
| + | ; Checking & refactoring clitics (cont.) |
||
| + | |||
| + | A question whether <code>%+ғана%<postadv%>:% %{G%}ана # ; ! "only"</code> in <code>CLIT</code> continuation class was correct produced a discussion about whether we should handle harmonizing of such words in transducer (means matching them to the previous word) or post-generator can take care of that. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Another thing is that some Tatar modal particles do not vary depending of the previous word (e.g. "бит"), but I have put them into <code>CLIT</code> continuation class (as all other modal particles were there). This might be wrong. |
||
| + | |||
| + | I learned a lot of new stuff :), but the possible changes in CLIT lexicon were kept for later. |
||
| + | |||
| + | ; Some work on postadverbs |
||
| + | |||
| + | See [[../Postadverbs]] |
||
Revision as of 22:25, 29 May 2012
Monday, 28th May 2012
- Checking & refactoring clitics
Some of the clitics appear only after certain forms (e.g. "шы<mod_foc>" in Kazakh, which expresses politeness, joins only 2nd person singular). And vice versa - some of the forms can get only certain clitics (imperative forms get only "чы" and "сана" in Tatar)
I moved the above clitics into a separate lexicon, and linked imperative forms to it, so that there is no overgeneration now (and a bit easier life for spectie's "testvocing" PC's).
In Tatar some new clitics were added as well.
Monday, 28th May 2012
- Checking & refactoring clitics (cont.)
A question whether %+ғана%<postadv%>:% %{G%}ана # ; ! "only" in CLIT continuation class was correct produced a discussion about whether we should handle harmonizing of such words in transducer (means matching them to the previous word) or post-generator can take care of that.
Another thing is that some Tatar modal particles do not vary depending of the previous word (e.g. "бит"), but I have put them into CLIT continuation class (as all other modal particles were there). This might be wrong.
I learned a lot of new stuff :), but the possible changes in CLIT lexicon were kept for later.
- Some work on postadverbs
