Difference between revisions of "Comparison of part-of-speech tagging systems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{|class=wikitable |
{|class=wikitable |
||
− | !rowspan=2|Language !!colspan= |
+ | !rowspan=2|Language !!colspan=4|System |
|- |
|- |
||
− | ! 1st !! CG+1st !! Unigram |
+ | ! 1st !! CG+1st !! Unigram || CG+Unigram |
|- |
|- |
||
− | | Catalan || 81.85 || 83.96 |
+ | | Catalan || 81.85 || 83.96 || [75.65, 78.46]|| [87.76, 90.48] |
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
+ | |||
− | * Unigram |
||
− | * CG + Unigram |
||
* apertium-tagger |
* apertium-tagger |
||
* CG + apertium-tagger |
* CG + apertium-tagger |
Revision as of 15:00, 21 December 2015
Language | System | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1st | CG+1st | Unigram | CG+Unigram | |
Catalan | 81.85 | 83.96 | [75.65, 78.46] | [87.76, 90.48] |
- apertium-tagger
- CG + apertium-tagger