Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...istiques non supportées par le format .dix . Les objectifs de ces nouveaux formats ''dix-like'' sont : Il y a actuellement un débat sur l'unification de ces formats dans un format metadix unique qui à son tour pourrait être aussi utilisé12 KB (1,883 words) - 08:42, 8 October 2014
- ...RTF, HTML, and LATEX formats with plans to support older Microsoft Office formats (DOC, XLS, PPT).17 KB (2,558 words) - 05:25, 24 October 2019
- == Information about the project Unify the metadix formats == '''Basic understanding of the Metadix and other formats:231 bytes (33 words) - 20:58, 16 March 2014
- * Attaching tag stacks to words may necessitate a change in the lexical form formats that the structural transfer modules deal with. ...nsidered textual (e.g. title), and some others that are relevant for other formats. The quirk with e.g. <nowiki><code></nowiki> is that's sometimes an inline9 KB (1,486 words) - 19:56, 24 March 2020
- ...to work with CoNLL-U and CG3 formats, and to convert the data between the formats. It also allows to either upload or paste corpora in plain text and then co6 KB (930 words) - 15:59, 29 August 2017
- Lexical selection is done by <code>apertium-lextor --lextor</code>; the formats used to communicate with the rest of the modules of the translation engine The following example illustrates the input/output formats used by the lexical selector (we have assumed in the example that only the11 KB (1,814 words) - 03:22, 9 March 2019
- Our language data is in various formats, including XML and other human-editable texts. Language data is split into ...le-based and deterministic. We will happily [[Contact|help you learn]] our formats and methods, and we know from experience it is possible to learn and use Ap7 KB (1,139 words) - 06:27, 27 May 2021
- ...res not supported by the .dix format. The objectives of these new dix-like formats are: There is currently a debate on a unification of these formats into a single metadix format which in turn could also be used to support ot11 KB (1,733 words) - 08:24, 25 April 2016
- ...ools/freeling</code>) for converting between apertium formats and Freeling formats.5 KB (720 words) - 02:20, 10 March 2018
- ...[PMC proposals/Supporting open formats on the mailing list|Supporting open formats on the mailing list]]</s> -- '''Expired (3,0,0)'''2 KB (277 words) - 04:53, 4 April 2020
- ...far hardly used with this toolkit, other than coverage testing, where both formats are supported. Feel free to use whichever you're more comfortable with. Documentation about the configuration formats and XML schemas can be found on the wiki at http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/a12 KB (1,931 words) - 17:06, 24 October 2018
- [[Category:Formats]]5 KB (803 words) - 13:03, 25 November 2019
- ...neral Linguistics. University of Helsinki.</ref>, with the two alternative formats described above, semantic ordering in the first case:13 KB (2,315 words) - 08:44, 4 July 2013
- ...o/language-server-protocol/|Language Server] for the various Apertium rule formats23 KB (3,198 words) - 09:15, 4 March 2024
- ...se uses have different requirements for corpora, and a number of different formats for storing such corpora have sprung up. Some examples include:5 KB (813 words) - 00:08, 28 December 2011
- ...d I am very familiar with XML and most of the usual Apertium language data formats.11 KB (1,500 words) - 15:44, 30 April 2018
- [[Category:Formats]]3 KB (505 words) - 09:55, 6 October 2014
- '''DTD'''s for Apertium XML formats are available in SVN within these folders:460 bytes (74 words) - 08:59, 29 December 2015
- before trying to come up with formats13 KB (2,118 words) - 10:04, 3 May 2020
- [[Category:Formats]]543 bytes (71 words) - 09:13, 30 May 2014
