User:Khannatanmai/Secondary info apertium stream format
The secondary tags project was shelved as the need for reading specific secondary information wasn't established. This work continued as LU-bound secondary information using wordbound blanks.
Original Proposal: Modifying the apertium stream format and eliminating dictionary trimming: User:Khannatanmai/GSoC2020Proposal_Trimming
Development of the original proposal: User:Khannatanmai/New_Apertium_stream_format
New Proposal: User:Khannatanmai/Alternate_stream_modification
This page will follow the development of the new proposal for adding secondary information in the Apertium stream format.
Contents
Formalism
Instead of putting secondary information inside Lexical Units, we will put all information inside word bound blanks, and the only information that will be put inside a Lexical Unit, will be global reading IDs. These IDs will identify readings in a window uniquely, so that information inside word bound blanks can refer to specific IDs if need be.
Example Output of biltrans:
What was earlier:
^de<pr><sf:del><id:11><W:1.6787>/of<pr><sf:del><id:11><W:5.0984>/from<pr><sf:del><id:11><W:0.0065>$
Will now be:
^de<pr><!11>/of<pr><!67>/from<pr><!68>$[{sf:del}{sl_ids:11; W:1.6787}{sl_ids:11; tl_ids:67; W:5.0984}{sl_ids:11; tl_ids:68; W:0.0065}]
Features
- A word bound blank will be defined by the syntax ->
[{...}]
- It can have multiple blocks of information inside: ->
[{...}{...}{...}]
- If a block of information doesn't have
sl_ids
ortl_ids
, it refers to the entire LU (can be changed to{sl_ids:11; tl_ids:67,68}
if we want that each block in a word bound blank should have IDs. sl_ids
andtl_ids
can take multiple ids (from source or from target). This helps deal with many-to-many relationships between the tokens of the two languages.- When LUs merge, a new blank block is added that preserves information about the order of the original LUs with their ids. Also, the secondary information from all those LUs is added to the wordbound blank of the new merged LU, with each of their IDs inside the blocks.
- When LUs break, secondary information is duplicated onto all parts, and each part gets the same compound id. Right now the order of the parts of the compound isn't preserved but it can be, if needed.
Rationale
Uses
Surface form
Preserving Input token IDs
Markup Information
Reading specific weights
Reading specific dependencies
Examples
Compounds & Surface Form
Secondary Tags:
^intrastruktuur<n><id:12><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>$ ^ontwikkelings<n><id:13><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>$ ^plan<n><id:14><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>$
Word bound blanks:
^intrastruktuur<n><!12>$[{sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan}] ^ontwikkelings<n><!13>$[{sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan$}] ^plan<n><!14>$[{sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan}]
After biltrans:
Secondary Tags:
^intrastruktuur<n><id:12><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>/infrastructure<n><id:12><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>$ ^ontwikkelings<n><id:13><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>/development<n><id:13><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>$ ^plan<n><id:14><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>/plan<n><id:14><sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan>$
Word bound blanks:
^intrastruktuur<n><!12>/infrastructure<n><!65>$[{sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan}] ^ontwikkelings<n><!13>/development<n><!66>$[{sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan$}] ^plan<n><!14>/plan<n><!67>$[{sf:intrastruktuurontwikkelingsplan}]
Another one
Original Analyser Output:
^«/«<lquot>$^Ajawxel/Ajawaxel<n>$^,/,<cm>$ ^ri/ri<det>$ ^in/in<prn><pers><p1><sg>/in<prn><pro><p1><sg>$ ^kinwilo/<impf><o_sg3><s_sg1>il<v><tv>+o<mark>$ ^che/chi<pr>+<px3sg>ech<n><rel>$ ^ri/ri<det>$ ^at/at<prn><pers><p2><sg>/at<prn><pro><p2><sg>$^,/,<cm>$ ^at/at<prn><pers><p2><sg>/at<prn><pro><p2><sg>$ ^jun/jun<adj>/jun<n>/jun<num>$ ^qʼaxal/qʼaxal<adj>$ ^utzij/<px3sg>tzij<n>$ ^ri/ri<det>$ ^Dyos/Dyos<n>$
New Analyser Output:
Special tag in the LU that will be ignored by FSTs. Format: <!..>
W: weight
^«/«<lquot><!1>$[{W:0.987}]^Ajawxel/Ajawaxel<n><!2>$[{W:0.587}]^,/,<cm><!3>$[{W:0.953}] ^ri/ri<det><!4>$[{W:0.675}] ^in/in<prn><pers><p1><sg><!5>/in<prn><pro><p1><sg><!6>$[{sl_ids:5; W:0.203}{sl_ids:6; W:0.457}] ^kinwilo/<impf><o_sg3><s_sg1>il<v><tv><!7>+o<mark><!8>$[{sl_ids:7; W:0.621}{sl_ids:8; W:0.760}] ^che/chi<pr><!9>+<px3sg>ech<n><rel><!10>$[{sl_ids:9; W:0.832}{sl_ids:10; W:0.562}] ^ri/ri<det><!11>$[{W:0.675}] ^at/at<prn><pers><p2><sg><!12>/at<prn><pro><p2><sg><!13>$[{sl_ids:12; W:0.709}{sl_ids:13; W:0.302}]^,/,<cm><!14>$[{W:0.953}] ^at/at<prn><pers><p2><sg><!15>/at<prn><pro><p2><sg><!16>$[{sl_ids:15; W:0.709}{sl_ids:16; W:0.302}] ^jun/jun<adj><!17>/jun<n><!18>/jun<num><!19>$[{sl_ids:17; W:0.123}{sl_ids:18; W:0.346}{sl_ids:19; W:0.841}] ^qʼaxal/qʼaxal<adj><!20>$[{W:0.301}] ^utzij/<px3sg>tzij<n><!21>$[{W:0.205}] ^ri/ri<det><!22>$[{W:0.675}] ^Dyos/Dyos<n><!23>$[{W:0.442}]
Tagger Output:
sf-> surface form
^«<lquot><!1>$[{W:0.987; sf:«}]^Ajawaxel<n><!2>$[{W:0.587; sf:Ajawxel}]^,<cm><!3>$[{W:0.953; sf:,}] ^ri<det><!4>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^in<prn><pro><p1><sg><!6>$[{sl_ids:6; W:0.457; sf:in}] ^<impf><o_sg3><s_sg1>il<v><tv><!7>+o<mark><!8>$[{sf:kinwilo}{sl_ids:7; W:0.621}{sl_ids:8; W:0.760}] ^chi<pr><!9>+<px3sg>ech<n><rel><!10>$[{sf:che}{sl_ids:9; W:0.832}{sl_ids:10; W:0.562}] ^ri<det><!11>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^at<prn><pers><p2><sg><!12>$[{sl_ids:12; W:0.709; sf:at}]^,<cm><!14>$[{W:0.953; sf:,}] ^at<prn><pro><p2><sg><!16>$[{sl_ids:16; W:0.302; sf:at}] ^jun<num><!19>$[{sl_ids:19; W:0.841; sf:jun}] ^qʼaxal<adj><!20>$[{W:0.301; sf:qʼaxal}] ^<px3sg>tzij<n><!21>$[{W:0.205; sf:utzij}] ^ri<det><!22>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^Dyos<n><!23>$[{W:0.442; sf:Dyos}]
Pretransfer Output:
cmp_id: compound id
^«<lquot><!1>$[{W:0.987; sf:«}]^Ajawaxel<n><!2>$[{W:0.587; sf:Ajawxel}]^,<cm><!3>$[{W:0.953; sf:,}] ^ri<det><!4>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^in<prn><pro><p1><sg><!6>$[{sl_ids:6; W:0.457; sf:in}] ^<impf><o_sg3><s_sg1>il<v><tv><!7>$[{sl_ids:7; W:0.621; cmp_id:1; sf:kinwilo}]^o<mark><!8>$[{sl_ids:8; W:0.760; cmp_id:1; sf:kinwilo}] ^chi<pr><!9>$[{sl_ids:9; W:0.832; cmp_id:2; sf:che}] ^<px3sg>ech<n><rel><!10>$[{sl_ids:10; W:0.562; cmp_id:2; sf:che}] ^ri<det><!11>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^at<prn><pers><p2><sg><!12>$[{sl_ids:12; W:0.709; sf:at}]^,<cm><!14>$[{W:0.953; sf:,}] ^at<prn><pro><p2><sg><!16>$[{sl_ids:16; W:0.302; sf:at}] ^jun<num><!19>$[{sl_ids:19; W:0.841; sf:jun}] ^qʼaxal<adj><!20>$[{W:0.301; sf:qʼaxal}] ^<px3sg>tzij<n><!21>$[{W:0.205; sf:utzij}] ^ri<det><!22>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^Dyos<n><!23>$[{W:0.442; sf:Dyos}]
Separable Output:
mw_part: parts of a multi-word unit
^«<lquot><!1>$[{W:0.987; sf:«}]^Ajawaxel<n><!2>$[{W:0.587; sf:Ajawxel}]^,<cm><!3>$[{W:0.953; sf:,}] ^ri<det><!4>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^in<prn><pro><p1><sg><!6>$[{sl_ids:6; W:0.457; sf:in}] ^<impf><o_sg3><s_sg1>il<v><tv><!7>$[{sl_ids:7; W:0.621; cmp_id:1; sf:kinwilo}]^o<mark><!8>$[{sl_ids:8; W:0.760; cmp_id:1; sf:kinwilo}] ^chi<pr><!9>$[{sl_ids:9; W:0.832; cmp_id:2; sf:che}] ^<px3sg>ech<n><rel><!10>$[{sl_ids:10; W:0.562; cmp_id:2; sf:che}] ^ri<det><!11>$[{W:0.675; sf:ri}] ^at<prn><pers><p2><sg><!12>$[{sl_ids:12; W:0.709; sf:at}]^,<cm><!14>$[{W:0.953; sf:,}] ^at<prn><pro><p2><sg><!16>$[{sl_ids:16; W:0.302; sf:at}] ^jun<num><!19>$[{sl_ids:19; W:0.841; sf:jun}] ^qʼaxal tzij ri Dyos<n><!24>$[{sl_ids:20; W:0.301; sf:qʼaxal; mw_part:1}{sl_ids:21; W:0.205; sf:utzij; mw_part:2}{sl_ids:22; W:0.675; sf:ri; mw_part:3}{sl_ids:23; W:0.442; sf:Dyos; mw_part:4}]
Thoughts
- compound id stores the id of the compound, but currently doesn't store the order of the parts in the compound (assumed to be ascending order of ids). mw_part does preserve the order.
- I'm trying to make all blank blocks go with a general philosophy of having sl&tl ids and the other information pertaining to these.
Possibilities:
^qʼaxal tzij ri Dyos<n><!24>$[{mw_ids:20,21,22,23}{sl_ids:20; sf:qʼaxal}{sl_ids:21; sf:utzij}{sl_ids:22; sf:ri}{sl_ids:23; sf:Dyos}]
^qʼaxal tzij ri Dyos<n><!24>$[{sl_ids:20; sf:qʼaxal}{sl_ids:21; sf:utzij}{sl_ids:22; sf:ri}{sl_ids:23; sf:Dyos}]