Difference between revisions of "Conllu Parsing and Searching"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:


This will output the same thing as what the other searches would do. Use other searches to distinguish between what you are searching for.
This will output the same thing as what the other searches would do. Use other searches to distinguish between what you are searching for.

You can do very simple searches like <code> python conlluparse.py "text.conllu" "lemma=Еуровидение,form=Еуровидениенің" </code> without the > or <


== Examples ==
== Examples ==

Revision as of 05:39, 22 December 2017

Parse and Search through a conllu file

Searching is as follows:


Tree search

If you would like to search with a tree this is how you would do it. Then, between the words you are searching for a relation between add a '>'. You can also use and '<' if you are searching for a word that is a dependent of another word. This, the '<', will find the dependent word. For instance, if you wanted to see when 'have' did action to 'clue' (i.e. I have no clue') you could do it like this:

For example python conlluparse.py "text.conllu" 'have>clue' might output:

Token: 2, Form: have, Lemma: have, UPOSTAG: VERB, HEAD: 0, DEPREL: root, # sent_id = 2, Sentence:  I have no clue .

If you wanted, you could also be more specific or ambigious with your searches. When you specify these arguments, you also need to make sure that you concatenate "Form=" with the word you are searching for. When you have nothing specified on one side, you need to add 'none=none' to that side. For instance if you wanted to find if something was a dependent of 'have', you could do:

none=none<form=have

When searching with attributes (i.e UPOSTAG), you could do this like:

python conlluparse.py "text.conllu" 'upostag=verb, form=have>form=clue' which may output:

Token: 2, Form: have, Lemma: have, UPOSTAG: VERB, HEAD: 0, DEPREL: root, # sent_id = 2, Sentence:  I have no clue .

You can search with any of these tags - upostag, xpostag, lemma, or deprel. You would do this by just putting the tag name + and '=' and then the actual value. Concatenate the tag an '=' and the value like upostag=noun' or 'lemma=clue' or @.

You can also specify attributes instead of 'form=clue' such as 'upostag=noun'

Token: 2, Form: have, Lemma: have, UPOSTAG: VERB, HEAD: 0, DEPREL: root, # sent_id = 2, Sentence:  I have no clue .

Now, instead, if you search with python conlluparse.py "text.conllu" 'form=clue<none=none' , it will print:

Token: 4, Form: clue, Lemma: clue, UPOSTAG: NOUN, HEAD: 2, DEPREL: obj, # sent_id = 2, Sentence:  I have no clue .

The tree searches essentially combines all the searches terms. You can search for a word with a specific deprel or upostag like

@root, upostag=noun>none=none

You can search for relationships like the ; character:

@nsubj>upostag=noun

You can search for a plain word like:

form=have>none=none

This will output the same thing as what the other searches would do. Use other searches to distinguish between what you are searching for.

You can do very simple searches like python conlluparse.py "text.conllu" "lemma=Еуровидение,form=Еуровидениенің" without the > or <

Examples

python conlluparse.py "text.conllu" "{none=none>none=none, @obj" This is how you would run the program with the '{' Could output:

Token: 6, Form: іліп, Lemma: іл, UPOSTAG: VERB, HEAD: 0, DEPREL: root, # sent_id = Ер_Төстік.tagged.txt:23:396, Sentence:  Сөйткенде Төстіктің бір бақайы өрмекті іліп кетеді .