Difference between revisions of "Morphotactic constraints with twol"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This page describes how to use twol to implement morphotactic constraints. These are useful for modelling prefix and circumfix morphology. ==See also== * [[Starting a...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
This page describes how to use [[twol]] to implement morphotactic constraints. These are useful for modelling prefix and circumfix morphology.
This page describes how to use [[twol]] to implement morphotactic constraints. These are useful for modelling prefix and circumfix morphology.


==Prefixes==


Let's suppose you have a language like [[Avar]], where the first part of the verb stem changes for gender, for example:


{|class=wikitable
!colspan=3| бицине "to speak"
|-
| бицуна || {{sc|neu}}-иц-{{sc|aor}} || it speaks
|-
| вицуна || {{sc|msc}}-иц-{{sc|aor}} || he speaks, I (m.) speak, you (m.) speak
|-
| йицуна || {{sc|fem}}-иц-{{sc|aor}} || she speaks, I (f.) speak, you (f.) speak
|-
| рицуна || {{sc|pl}}-иц-{{sc|aor}} || they speak
|-
|}

So, the obvious thing would be just to put all of the forms in the lexicon, like:

<pre>

LEXICON AOR

%<aor%>:уна # ;

LEXICON Verbs

бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<nt%>:биц AOR ;
бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<m%>:виц AOR ;
бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<f%>:йиц AOR ;
бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<pl%>:риц AOR ;

</pre>

But this is inefficient! What we would like to do is have a single lexicon for the gender prefixes,

<pre>

LEXICON AOR

%<aor%>:уна # ;

LEXICON Prefixes

%<nt%>:б%> Verbs ;
%<m%>:в%> Verbs ;
%<f%>:й%> Verbs ;
%<pl%>:р%> Verbs ;

LEXICON Verbs

бицине%<v%>%<tv%>:иц AOR ; ! "говорить"

</pre>

This is great, but we have a problem... The tag for our prefix is in the wrong place!

<pre>
<nt>бицине<v><tv><aor>:б>ицуна
<m>бицине<v><tv><aor>:в>ицуна
<f>бицине<v><tv><aor>:й>ицуна
<pl>бицине<v><tv><aor>:р>ицуна
</pre>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 17:46, 4 February 2017

This page describes how to use twol to implement morphotactic constraints. These are useful for modelling prefix and circumfix morphology.

Prefixes

Let's suppose you have a language like Avar, where the first part of the verb stem changes for gender, for example:

бицине "to speak"
бицуна neu-иц-aor it speaks
вицуна msc-иц-aor he speaks, I (m.) speak, you (m.) speak
йицуна fem-иц-aor she speaks, I (f.) speak, you (f.) speak
рицуна pl-иц-aor they speak

So, the obvious thing would be just to put all of the forms in the lexicon, like:


LEXICON AOR

%<aor%>:уна # ;

LEXICON Verbs

бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<nt%>:биц AOR ;
бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<m%>:виц AOR ;
бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<f%>:йиц AOR ;
бицине%<v%>%<tv%>%<pl%>:риц AOR ;

But this is inefficient! What we would like to do is have a single lexicon for the gender prefixes,


LEXICON AOR

%<aor%>:уна # ;

LEXICON Prefixes

%<nt%>:б%> Verbs ;
%<m%>:в%> Verbs ;
%<f%>:й%> Verbs ;
%<pl%>:р%> Verbs ;

LEXICON Verbs

бицине%<v%>%<tv%>:иц AOR ; ! "говорить"

This is great, but we have a problem... The tag for our prefix is in the wrong place!

<nt>бицине<v><tv><aor>:б>ицуна
<m>бицине<v><tv><aor>:в>ицуна
<f>бицине<v><tv><aor>:й>ицуна
<pl>бицине<v><tv><aor>:р>ицуна

See also