Code style

C++

Which features/libraries to prefer/Semantics

New code should prefer modern C++ using C++03. Here, modern C++ is defined in opposition to "C with classes" style. (Note, there is quite a bit of existing code which would probably qualify as "C with classes".) In practice, for our purposes, This means:

Do

• Use const and references where possible
• Prefer C++ casts over C casts
• Prefer the C++ stdlib over the C standard library
• Prefer usage of smart pointers over manual memory management when stack/global allocation don't do the trick.
• Prefer containers over home made data structures.

Don't

• Use void*
• Use sprintf
• If the pointer lifetime is the same as the object it refers to. Don't use a raw pointer.

I'd like to use $LIB eg Boost:Wurble or remove ifdefs by using eg gnulib

No.

Please?

No.

Why not?

It's going to make it impossible to build for language pair authors.

But if it's a dependency that's built in tree it's just a matter of getting the source there. It could be bootstrapped with a simple script or even (ick) vendorised into Subversion.

This doesn't make any difference. Please just implement whatever you need from scratch.

Formatting/Syntax

This is less important. Currently through the code base there are:

• Sergio's style; e.g. fst_processor.cc
• m5w's style; e.g. basic_stream_tagger_trainer.cc
• felipe's style; e.g. apertium_tagger.cc

Most code is Sergio's style. See Emacs_C_style_for_Apertium_hacking for an older attempt at formalising it.

Wiki TODO: Document this below.

Possible project TODO: Run clang-format

m5w

• loosely following the Clang standards for naming and such
• strictly for indenting -- clang-format
• default to Clang naming style, unless I'm talking about some kind of STL class or STL imitation
• example of imitation is the serialiser class for pairs which are named as such: first_Type, second_Type so we can do can do pair.first and .second
• keep the STL format for the part of the name that's STL
• but if it's followed by something not STL, then I finish out with an underscore and then go to CamelCase
• another divergence is with variables that don't have a whole lot of information e.g. something being passed to a serialiser: they get bland names such as Stream and SerialisedType
• since those are already used as type names -- just add a trailing underscore

Python

PEP-8?