Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corpus test"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(asking for a more clear formulation)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
* <code>fgrep -n "#"</code> monodix
* <code>fgrep -n "#"</code> monodix
* <code>fgrep -n "@"</code> bidix
* <code>fgrep -n "@"</code> bidix

: I'm pretty sure that's not the intention; I think "nl" is here used to find the ''corpus'' line numbers, not dix line numbers --[[User:Unhammer|unhammer]] 11:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:21, 5 January 2012

Creation of a corpus

These 2 lines are not very clear for a non english native :

  • Grep out all lines with # and @ - this will help you find problems in bidix (@) and target language monodix (#).
  • Pipe through nl -s '. ' to get the right line numbers.

An example would be better. And on my computer, nl -s does not work, but the option -n of grep (fgrep, egrep) does.

Why not something like :

  • fgrep -n "#" monodix
  • fgrep -n "@" bidix
I'm pretty sure that's not the intention; I think "nl" is here used to find the corpus line numbers, not dix line numbers --unhammer 11:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)