Difference between revisions of "Northern Sámi and Norwegian/release"
(Created page with 'Stuff to do before release: * make sure each possible chunk that might need postchunk operations has a postchunk rule ** so any pron/det, noun, adjective, verb') |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page holds information about the release schedule for |
|||
Stuff to do before release: |
|||
[[apertium-sme-nob]]. |
|||
* make sure each possible chunk that might need postchunk operations has a postchunk rule |
|||
** so any pron/det, noun, adjective, verb |
|||
==Issues== |
|||
===High priority bad translations=== |
|||
What are the high-priority linguistic issues to deal with? |
|||
Would we gain a lot by inserting modals instead of adverbs for |
|||
Pot/Cond verbs? Is there a better, general, way to translate the |
|||
progressive? Should we get some of Francis' automatically discovered |
|||
lex.sel rules? And are there any "simple" constructions that we could |
|||
handle but don't yet? |
|||
===Derivations:=== |
|||
Any [[Northern Sámi and Norwegian/Derivations|derivations]] that are |
|||
not handled should be removed from the analyser. Maybe we could have |
|||
a "negation" twol rule like |
|||
<pre> |
|||
? /<= UnhandledDerivations _ ; ! fail if analysis contains a tag from the set UnhandledDerivations |
|||
</pre> |
|||
If this works, we could probably also write a rule like |
|||
<pre> |
|||
? /<= AnyDerivationtag+ PoStag+ AnyDerivationtag+ _ ; |
|||
</pre> |
|||
to remove any derivations of derivations, since these are not handled |
|||
either unless there are explicit transfer rules for them. We should |
|||
remove any unhandled derivations before testvoc. |
|||
[[Northern Sámi and Norwegian/Derivations#Summary of fallbacks]] |
|||
contains the list of derivations that are and aren't handled. |
|||
===Testvoc=== |
|||
Before release, we need to get [[testvoc]] out of the way – making |
|||
sure there are no #'s and @'s in the output. As yet we don't have a |
|||
way to create all possible surface forms from an [[HFST]] analyser, |
|||
but we can at least run as large a corpus as we can find through |
|||
sme-nob and look for # and @. |
|||
Postchunk rules are needed for any chunk containing a |
|||
determiner/pronoun/adjective/noun/verb, we can easily make sure each |
|||
possible chunk name has a postchunk rule (new chunks are created in |
|||
t1x with names like det_adj_nom, but may also be merged in t2x to |
|||
eg. det_adj_nom_conj_nom) |
|||
==Schedule== |
|||
{|class=wikitable |
|||
! Task !! Date |
|||
|- |
|||
| Work on high priority bad translations || until 2010-07-25 |
|||
|- |
|||
| Remove unhandled derivations, ensure we have all postchunk rules || 2010-07-26…2010-08-01 |
|||
|- |
|||
| Testvoc || 2010-08-01…2010-08-15 |
|||
|- |
|||
| Tentative release date for apertium-sme-nob 0.1.0 || August 15th 2010. |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 08:02, 27 June 2010
This page holds information about the release schedule for apertium-sme-nob.
Issues
High priority bad translations
What are the high-priority linguistic issues to deal with?
Would we gain a lot by inserting modals instead of adverbs for Pot/Cond verbs? Is there a better, general, way to translate the progressive? Should we get some of Francis' automatically discovered lex.sel rules? And are there any "simple" constructions that we could handle but don't yet?
Derivations:
Any derivations that are not handled should be removed from the analyser. Maybe we could have a "negation" twol rule like
? /<= UnhandledDerivations _ ; ! fail if analysis contains a tag from the set UnhandledDerivations
If this works, we could probably also write a rule like
? /<= AnyDerivationtag+ PoStag+ AnyDerivationtag+ _ ;
to remove any derivations of derivations, since these are not handled either unless there are explicit transfer rules for them. We should remove any unhandled derivations before testvoc. Northern Sámi and Norwegian/Derivations#Summary of fallbacks contains the list of derivations that are and aren't handled.
Testvoc
Before release, we need to get testvoc out of the way – making sure there are no #'s and @'s in the output. As yet we don't have a way to create all possible surface forms from an HFST analyser, but we can at least run as large a corpus as we can find through sme-nob and look for # and @.
Postchunk rules are needed for any chunk containing a determiner/pronoun/adjective/noun/verb, we can easily make sure each possible chunk name has a postchunk rule (new chunks are created in t1x with names like det_adj_nom, but may also be merged in t2x to eg. det_adj_nom_conj_nom)
Schedule
Task | Date |
---|---|
Work on high priority bad translations | until 2010-07-25 |
Remove unhandled derivations, ensure we have all postchunk rules | 2010-07-26…2010-08-01 |
Testvoc | 2010-08-01…2010-08-15 |
Tentative release date for apertium-sme-nob 0.1.0 | August 15th 2010. |