Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jimregan"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Please: Uh... no)
Line 24: Line 24:
Is that OK?
Is that OK?
Thank you in advance.[[User:Muki987|Muki987]] 22:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you in advance.[[User:Muki987|Muki987]] 22:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

:No

:As long as you continue to spread pseudo-scientific nonsense, to dismiss ideas just because they don't fit into your set of preconceived notions, and otherwise continue to spread wrong-headed notions, I will continue to criticise those things. I'd hate to think people thought your nonsense was worth taking seriously.

:Honestly; sometimes you come across sounding like [http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/bronze/saharan.htm this rubbish]. -- [[User:Jimregan|Jimregan]] 22:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:53, 16 May 2009

Wow awesome. Great work!

Which pair were you interested in Polish to/from ? Scratch that, I see Polish—English. If you want I can help set it up in our SVN. Do you have some kind of instant messaging ? - Francis Tyers 20:43, 6 October 2007 (BST)

Probably for the bilingual dictionary, a probabilistic dictionary could be exactracted from the EuroParl JRC-Acquis corpus (see Corpora) using GIZA++ — of course it would need checking. - Francis Tyers 20:57, 6 October 2007 (BST)

Ok, well, for Irish-English, we might be able to get some help from Kevin Scannell, who has an unreleased Irish-Scots Gaelic pair, but who is very in favour of GPL software. Probably the pair with the best prospects is Polish-Russian, but its worth giving them all a go I reckon. My googletalk/gmail is firstname.lastname@gmail.com, ICQ is 28459314. Do you have a sourceforge account yet? We'll be moving to self-hosting at some point, but at the moment we're using sourceforge for SVN.

Regarding the "unsupported transducer type", what can you give me the versions of lttoolbox-unicode and apertium-unicode that you are using? I'll try your dictionary and see how it works. - Francis Tyers 21:54, 6 October 2007 (BST)

Discussion page

I set up a discussion page here. - Francis Tyers 09:14, 10 October 2007 (BST)

Please

Please spare your remarks in the future in subjects I talk with others in this wiki or in the mailing list. I am not at all interested in your opinions and remarks, and find them highly irritating, discourteous and destructive. Please concentrate on things, you can do well, maybe Polish-English translation, perl programming or whatever. Thanks. Muki987 20:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

What a pity. I do find your semi-crazed rantings amusing -- Jimregan 21:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Please keep your attributes for yourself (semi-crazed rantings). They characterize your person quite well. I do not find your writings amusant, I find them primitive and provocative. I do not need your admiration, your offer and I especially do not need your critics, I only need, that you keep distance. Unfortunately you do not explain things, just criticize and provocate. I do not think, you can ever be constructive in the sense, I accept people. No remarks in the future to my writings, please. I promise, I will not react to your writings to others, as a reward. Especially never in the sense of destructive personal attacks, as you do it all the time. Is that OK? Thank you in advance.Muki987 22:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

No
As long as you continue to spread pseudo-scientific nonsense, to dismiss ideas just because they don't fit into your set of preconceived notions, and otherwise continue to spread wrong-headed notions, I will continue to criticise those things. I'd hate to think people thought your nonsense was worth taking seriously.
Honestly; sometimes you come across sounding like this rubbish. -- Jimregan 22:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)