Difference between revisions of "Earley-based structural transfer for Apertium"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added some more ideas) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* When would one call the bilingual dictionary? Apertium Level 2 calls it in the first stage. |
* When would one call the bilingual dictionary? Apertium Level 2 calls it in the first stage. |
||
* We should check whether this has been done before. |
* We should check whether this has been done before. |
||
==Further reading== |
|||
* [http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:GwOQsQtddJIJ:www.isi.edu/natural-language/mt/hlt-naacl-06-zhang.pdf+earley%27s+algorithm+machine+translation&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&client=iceweasel-a http://www.isi.edu/natural-language/mt/hlt-naacl-06-zhang.pdf] |
|||
* [http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:PZewJi8kmc0J:www.slt.atr.jp/IWSLT2006/proceedings/EC_13_NTT.pdf+earley+algorithm+%22machine+translation%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&client=iceweasel-a http://www.slt.atr.jp/IWSLT2006/proceedings/EC_13_NTT.pdf] |
Revision as of 13:26, 20 May 2007
Perhaps [Earley's algorithm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earley's_algorithm] to parse context-free grammars (which has a left-to-right longest-match philosophy as Apertium) could be used to perform more complex syntactical transformations; this could be useful for distant language pairs containing embedded structures.
Open questions:
- Currently, Apertium uses text streams to communicate. I assume this would not be possible here.
- When would one call the bilingual dictionary? Apertium Level 2 calls it in the first stage.
- We should check whether this has been done before.