Difference between revisions of "Online Apertium Workshop 2020"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Session #1: Tuesday, June 30, 1400Z–1600Z== |
==Session #1: Tuesday, June 30, 1400Z–1600Z== |
||
(Under construction) |
|||
There are only two presentations so far (only three of you have registered; 8 people have selected dates in the Doodle).1 |
|||
* 1400 Welcome and adjustments |
* 1400 Welcome and adjustments |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* 1505 "Moving all Multiwords to Apertium-separable", Daniel Swanson |
* 1505 "Moving all Multiwords to Apertium-separable", Daniel Swanson |
||
**"I will describe what would be involved in migrating most or all multiwords from monodixes to language-specific -separable rules, including the extent to which it can be automated and how it might impact the other debates surrounding trimming and secondary information. (If this is deemed out-of-scope for this discussion, let me know, though I'm interested in attending regardless.)" |
**"I will describe what would be involved in migrating most or all multiwords from monodixes to language-specific -separable rules, including the extent to which it can be automated and how it might impact the other debates surrounding trimming and secondary information. (If this is deemed out-of-scope for this discussion, let me know, though I'm interested in attending regardless.)" |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* 1505 ??? |
|||
* |
* ??? |
||
* 1555 Closing |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== Session #2: Thursday, July 2, 1400Z–1600Z== |
== Session #2: Thursday, July 2, 1400Z–1600Z== |
||
Revision as of 07:06, 24 June 2020
Online Apertium Workshop 2020
A two-session online workshop to discuss how information flows from one module to another in the Apertium pipeline,
Session #1: Tuesday, June 30, 1400Z–1600Z
(Under construction)
- 1400 Welcome and adjustments
- 1410 "Rule-based machine translation and the Apertium paradigm", Francis Tyers
- I will present a short overview of rule-based machine translation paradigms and situate Apertium within them.
- 1425 "Why we want to eliminate trimming and the motivation for secondary information", Tanmai Khanna
- I will try to give a background about the entire secondary information discussion. This started as a project to eliminate trimming, and secondary information came out of it as a possible solution to that and other problems, such as markup handling. I will present the pros and cons of trimming and why we want to eliminate it, and the possible solutions.
- 1450 "Reading-bound data as inline secondary tags", Tino Didriksen
- "Reading-bound data is best transported as inline secondary tags, proven both by practical experience and theoretical complexity."
- 1505 "Moving all Multiwords to Apertium-separable", Daniel Swanson
- "I will describe what would be involved in migrating most or all multiwords from monodixes to language-specific -separable rules, including the extent to which it can be automated and how it might impact the other debates surrounding trimming and secondary information. (If this is deemed out-of-scope for this discussion, let me know, though I'm interested in attending regardless.)"
- 1520 Open discussion
- ???
- 1555 Closing
Session #2: Thursday, July 2, 1400Z–1600Z
General discussion
