Difference between revisions of "Lint"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
==Tagger==
==Tagger==


==Others==
==Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}==


;Lexical selection
This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:

* don't use <code>lrx-proc</code> without the <code>-m</code> option.


;Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}

*This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:


* bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)
* bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)

Revision as of 07:49, 1 May 2016

Monodix

Bidix

Transfer

  • when doing <clip>, check that the attribute listed in part="" is defined using a <def-attr>.

Modes

Tagger

Others

Lexical selection
  • don't use lrx-proc without the -m option.


Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}
  • This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:
  • bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)