Difference between revisions of "Flag diacritics considered harmful"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " <pre> <Flammie> convincing arguments come through empirical evidence of real world data <Flammie> almost only flag diacritics that give sizable growth in elimination are thos...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
<Flammie> convincing arguments come through empirical evidence of real world data |
<Flammie> convincing arguments come through empirical evidence of real world data |
||
<Flammie> almost only flag diacritics that give sizable growth in elimination are those examples in |
<Flammie> almost only flag diacritics that give sizable growth in elimination are those examples in |
||
karttunen's finnish numerals |
|||
<Flammie> besides, flags were meant to serve two totally independent uses that have no relation, |
<Flammie> besides, flags were meant to serve two totally independent uses that have no relation, |
||
⚫ | |||
optimisation and the morphotactics, they should not be interlinked |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
then we can come up with hyperminimisation scheme |
|||
⚫ | |||
size is as much non-sense as you'd ask python programmer to optimise code by inline assembly |
|||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
Revision as of 22:53, 18 June 2014
<Flammie> convincing arguments come through empirical evidence of real world data <Flammie> almost only flag diacritics that give sizable growth in elimination are those examples in karttunen's finnish numerals <Flammie> besides, flags were meant to serve two totally independent uses that have no relation, optimisation and the morphotactics, they should not be interlinked <Flammie> iff one of the +- tags defined in spectre's scheme actually gives any measurable growth, then we can come up with hyperminimisation scheme <Flammie> having linguists write flags and think that they're doing positive impact to automaton size is as much non-sense as you'd ask python programmer to optimise code by inline assembly