Difference between revisions of "PMC proposals/Debian package mantainer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCD}} |
|||
=2011/07/19 #3: Debian package maintainer= |
|||
==Summary== |
|||
Recruiting someone to make sure that Apertium packages in Debian are reasonably up-to-date. |
Recruiting someone to make sure that Apertium packages in Debian are reasonably up-to-date. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
[http://lists.debian.org/debian-jobs/ This] could be a good place to advertise it: |
[http://lists.debian.org/debian-jobs/ This] could be a good place to advertise it: |
||
Proposed by: [[User:Mlforcada]] |
|||
Seconded by: [[User:Francis Tyers]] |
|||
==In detail== |
|||
==Caveats== |
|||
==Comments== |
|||
==Voting== |
|||
=== Agree === |
|||
===Disagree=== |
|||
===Abstain=== |
|||
Revision as of 21:26, 27 November 2012
2011/07/19 #3: Debian package maintainer
Summary
Recruiting someone to make sure that Apertium packages in Debian are reasonably up-to-date.
The recruitee would get a yearly stipend, for making a Debian release of all the stable packages with changes every 6 months with a maintenance release if and when libpcre becomes incompatible.
The stipend would be €1000/year, based on Fran's experience of how much work it is.
If we continue in GSOC in the same way, this would represent 1/6 of the annual GSOC-earnings.
This could be a good place to advertise it:
Proposed by: User:Mlforcada
Seconded by: User:Francis Tyers
