Difference between revisions of "Talk:Constraint-based lexical selection module"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCD}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Note: Felipe doesn't like "skip". |
Note: Felipe doesn't like "skip". |
||
Revision as of 11:18, 1 December 2011
Contents |
Rule formats
Note: Felipe doesn't like "skip".
- can't say I do either … sounds like a command rather than a constraint --unhammer 11:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- also, in the <or>, should we read them as independent of each other? that's a bit confusing since otherwise they're all required and have a certain order --unhammer 11:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
The regular expression for the OR below is:
(nazi<adj>[0-9A-Za-z <>]*|totalitari<adj>[0-9A-Za-z <>]*|feixista<adj>[0-9A-Za-z <>]*|franquista<adj>[0-9A-Za-z <>]*|militar<adj>[0-9A-Za-z <>]*|fiscal<adj>[0-9A-Za-z <>]*)
- Francis Tyers 11:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- 1
<rule>
<remove lemma="règim" tags="n.*">
<acception lemma="diet" tags="n.*"/>
</remove>
<or>
<skip lemma="nazi" tags="adj.*"/>
<skip lemma="totalitari" tags="adj.*"/>
<skip lemma="feixista" tags="adj.*"/>
<skip lemma="franquista" tags="adj.*"/>
<skip lemma="militar" tags="adj.*"/>
<skip lemma="fiscal" tags="adj.*"/>
</or>
</rule>
- 2
<rule>
<remove lemma="règim" tags="n.*">
<acception lemma="diet" tags="n.*"/>
</remove>
<or>
<pattern lemma="nazi" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern lemma="totalitari" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern lemma="feixista" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern lemma="franquista" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern lemma="militar" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern lemma="fiscal" tags="adj.*"/>
</or>
</rule>
- 3
<rule>
<remove-from lemma="règim" tags="n.*">
<translation lemma="diet" tags="n.*"/>
</remove-from>
<pattern>
<or>
<pattern-item lemma="nazi" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="totalitari" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="feixista" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="franquista" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="militar" tags="adj.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="fiscal" tags="adj.*"/>
</or>
</pattern>
</rule>
<rule c="la dona dels seus somnis">
<select-for lemma="dona" tags="n.*">
<translation lemma="wife" tags="n.*"/>
</select>
<pattern>
<pattern-item lemma="de" tags="pr.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="*" tags="det.pos.*"/>
<pattern-item lemma="somni" tags="n.*"/>
</pattern>
</rule>
- 4
<rule>
<target lemma="règim" tags="n.*">
<remove lemma="diet" tags="n.*"/>
</target>
…
</rule>
<rule c="la dona dels seus somnis">
<target lemma="dona" tags="n.*">
<select lemma="wife" tags="n.*"/>
</target>
…
</rule>
Old application strategy
The following is an inefficient implementation of the rule application process:
# s ("prova" n) ("event" n) (-3 "guanyador") (-2 "de")
#
# tipus = "select";
# centre = "^prova<n>.*"
# tl_patro = ["^event<n>.*"]
# sl_patro = {-3: "^guanyador<", -2: "^de<"}
CLASS Rule:
tipus = enum('select', 'remove')
centre = '';
tl_patro = [];
sl_patro = {};
rule_table = {}; # e.g. rule_table["estació"] = [rule1, rule2, rule3];
i = 0
DEFINE ApplyRule(rule, lu):
FOREACH target IN lu.tl:
SWITCH rule.tipus:
'select':
IF target NOT IN rule.tl_patro:
DELETE target
'remove':
IF target IN rule.tl_patro:
DELETE target
FOREACH pair(sl, tl) IN sentence:
FOREACH centre IN rule_table:
IF centre IN sl:
FOREACH rule IN rule_table[centre]:
matched = False
FOREACH context_item IN rule_table[centre][rule]:
IF context_item in sentence:
matched = True
ELSE:
matched = False
# If all of the context items have matched, and none of them have not matched
# if a rule matches break and continue to the pair.
IF matched == True:
sentence[i] = ApplyRule(rule_table[centre][rule], sentence[i])
break
i = i + 1