Difference between revisions of "User talk:Unhammer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Language is hard – hẘæt!: new section) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Language is hard – hẘæt! == |
== Language is hard – hẘæt! == |
||
<spectie> tuõˊlˈlʼjed <-- this is a word |
<spectie> tuõˊlˈlʼjed <-- this is a word |
||
<Flammie> at least skolt sami doesn't have combining underlines or |
<Flammie> at least skolt sami doesn't have combining underlines or |
||
word-internal exclamation marks and vertical bars |
word-internal exclamation marks and vertical bars |
||
<spectie> yeah, they win by not having word-internal exclamation marks |
<spectie> yeah, they win by not having word-internal exclamation marks |
||
<spectie> pretty much ever language apart from armenian wins there >__> |
<spectie> pretty much ever language apart from armenian wins there >__> |
||
Revision as of 08:45, 6 December 2023
Welcome to the Apertium Wiki! - Francis Tyers 22:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hei! -Ivar Refsdal
Talk:Liste des paires de langues
most of the three-letter-code pairs seem to be missing? (sme-nob, sme-fin, etc.)
- and it was for pairs you were working about. Francis Tyers wrote me about that later. The problem was a wrong character difficult to see in a regular expression ( l instead of ] ). So it didn't worked when there was a three-letter-code on the left side. See The answer I gave to Francis on my or his discussion page. Bech 16:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Language is hard – hẘæt!
<spectie> tuõˊlˈlʼjed <-- this is a word <Flammie> at least skolt sami doesn't have combining underlines or
word-internal exclamation marks and vertical bars
<spectie> yeah, they win by not having word-internal exclamation marks <spectie> pretty much ever language apart from armenian wins there >__>
