Difference between revisions of "Turkic languages/Ki"

Revision as of 12:38, 13 September 2023

The various "ki"s in Turkic (and Mongolic!).

usage	attaches to	resulting form	forms	examples
attributive locative	~locative	`<attr>`	^(kaz) -DAGI ^(kir) -DAGI ^(uzb) -dagi ^(tur) -DAki ^(sah) -TAAGI ^(khk) dAx(ʲ)	^(kaz) Бақшадағы ағаштар ^(kir) Бакчадагы дарактар ^(uzb) Bog'chadagi daraxtlar ^(tur) Bahçedeki ağaçlar ^(sah) Садтааҕы мастар ^(khk) Цэцэрлэг дэхь моднууд
substantival genitive	~genitive	`<subst>`	^(kaz) -Niki(n) ^(kir) -NIKI(n) ^(uzb) -niki ^(tur) -(n)Inki(n) ^(sah) — ^(khk) -nIx/-Inx	^(kaz) Сол ағаш біздікі ^(kir) Ошол дарак биздики ^(uzb) Shu daraxt bizniki ^(tur) Şu ağaç bizimki ^(khk) Тэр мод биднийх
attributive ~time adverbs	closed set of adverbs (mostly time)	`<attr>`	^(kaz) -GI ^(kir) -KI ^(uzb) -gi ^(tur) -ki/-kI ^(sah) -ŋI/-GI ^(khk) -х	^(kaz) бүгінгі, былтырғы ^(kir) бүгүнкү, былтыркы ^(uzb) bugungi, bulturgi ^(tur) bugünkü, geçen yılki ^(sah) бүгүҥҥү, былырыыҥҥы ^(khk) өмнөх, дараах
relative thingy	finite phrase (adverb, verb)	lambda(adverb phrase)??	^(kaz) — ^(kir) — ^(uzb) ki? ^(tur) ki ^(khk) — ^(sah) —	^(tur) Tabii ki, ... ^(tur) Dedim ki, ... ^(tur) Sanırım (ki), ...

In Sakha, evidence for -ŋI is forms like бэҕэһээҥи, while evidence for -GI is forms like аныгы. In all other environments (except after vowels) it's impossible to distinguish the two (сарсыҥҥы, быйылгы, аныгыскы, etc.).
What is кэнники (sah)?

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 === Notes ===
-* In Sakha, evidence for -ŋI is forms like бэҕэһээҥи, while evidence for -GI is forms like аныгы.  In all other environments (except after vowels) it's impossible to distinguish the two.
+* In Sakha, evidence for -ŋI is forms like бэҕэһээҥи, while evidence for -GI is forms like аныгы.  In all other environments (except after vowels) it's impossible to distinguish the two (сарсыҥҥы, быйылгы, аныгыскы, etc.).
 * What is кэнники (<tt>sah</tt>)?