Difference between revisions of "User:AMR-KELEG/GSoC19 Proposal"
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
* and a detailed work plan (including, if possible, a schedule with milestones and deliverables). |
* and a detailed work plan (including, if possible, a schedule with milestones and deliverables). |
||
== Work Plan == |
|||
{| class="wikitable" border="1" |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Community Bonding |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Communicate with the maintainers and get to know Apertium better. |
|||
⚫ | |||
Solve some issues on Github. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
(27 May - 3 June) |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Implement a baseline model for weigthing automata. |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Week 2 |
|||
(4 June - 10 June) |
|||
| Develop the first supervised model (Unigram counts). |
|||
⚫ | |||
Write a shell script for generating weights using a tagged corpus. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Week 3 |
|||
(11 June - 17 June) |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Read, Understand and plan for implementing the publication for the first unsupervised model. |
|||
* Week 12: |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
* '''Project completed''' |
|||
(18 June - 24 June) |
|||
| Finalise the first unsupervised model and compare it to the supervised one. |
|||
Include time needed to think, to program, to document and to disseminate. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
If you are intending to disseminate to a conference, which conference are you intending to submit to. Make sure |
|||
'''Deliverables: Two shell scripts for generating weights using both supervised and unsupervised techniques.''' |
|||
to factor in time taken to run any experiments/evaluations and write them up in your work plan. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
List your skills and give evidence of your qualifications. Tell us what is your current field of study, |
|||
(29 June - 5 July) |
|||
major, etc. Convince us that you can do the work. |
|||
| Read, Understand and plan for implementing the publication for the second unsupervised model. |
|||
|- |
|||
List any non-Summer-of-Code plans you have for the Summer, especially employment, if you are applying for |
|||
⚫ | |||
internships, and class-taking. Be specific about schedules and time commitments. we would like to be sure you have |
|||
(6 July - 12 July) |
|||
at least 30 free hours a week to develop for our project. |
|||
| Implement the second unsupervised model. |
|||
|- |
|||
[[Category:GSoC 2019 student proposals|AMR-KELEG]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
(13 July - 22 July) |
|||
| Read, Understand and plan for implementing the publication for the second unsupervised model. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
(23 July - 12 July) |
|||
| Implement the second unsupervised model. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
'''Deliverables: A shell script for using the second unsupervised model and a plan for implementing the third one.''' |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
(27 July - 2 August) |
|||
| Implement the third unsupervised model. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
(3 August - 9 August) |
|||
| Solve issues related to the developed models. |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
(10 August - 26 August) |
|||
| Write the required documentation and merge the code into Apertium's repositories. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Final evaluation''' |
|||
| |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 19:41, 28 March 2019
Contents
Personal Information
- Name: Amr Keleg
- E-mail address: amr.keleg@eng.asu.edu.eg / amr_mohamed@live.com
- IRC: AMR-KELEG
- Location: Cairo, Egypt
- Timezone: UTC+02
- Github: https://github.com/AMR-KELEG
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/amrkeleg
- Current job: A MSc student and a teacher assistant at Computer and systems department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams university, Cairo, Egypt.
- Experimental blog: https://ak-blog.herokuapp.com
Skills and qualifications
- Past GSoC participant.
- Competitive programming.
- Worked for one year on developing sentiment analysis model for Arabic language.
- Made several contributions to open source projects
- Participated in online and on-site competitive programming contest.
- Completed Udacity's data analysis nanodegree.
- Good command of git and the GitHub process of contribution.
- Experienced in using C++ and python.
- Using Ubuntu for more than 3 years.
- Basic knowledge of shell scripting.
Coding challenge
Code repository: https://github.com/AMR-KELEG/apertium-unsupervised-weighting-of-automata
Project Information
Why is it that you are interested in Apertium?
Which of the published tasks are you interested in? What do you plan to do?
Include a proposal, including
* a title, * reasons why Google and Apertium should sponsor it, * a description of how and who it will benefit in society, * and a detailed work plan (including, if possible, a schedule with milestones and deliverables).
Work Plan
Community Bonding | Communicate with the maintainers and get to know Apertium better.
Solve some issues on Github. |
Week 1
(27 May - 3 June) |
Implement a baseline model for weigthing automata. |
Week 2
(4 June - 10 June) |
Develop the first supervised model (Unigram counts).
Write a shell script for generating weights using a tagged corpus. |
Week 3
(11 June - 17 June) |
Read, Understand and plan for implementing the publication for the first unsupervised model. |
Week 4
(18 June - 24 June) |
Finalise the first unsupervised model and compare it to the supervised one. |
Evaluation 1
Deliverables: Two shell scripts for generating weights using both supervised and unsupervised techniques. | |
Week 5
(29 June - 5 July) |
Read, Understand and plan for implementing the publication for the second unsupervised model. |
Week 6
(6 July - 12 July) |
Implement the second unsupervised model. |
Week 7
(13 July - 22 July) |
Read, Understand and plan for implementing the publication for the second unsupervised model. |
Week 8
(23 July - 12 July) |
Implement the second unsupervised model. |
Evaluation 2
Deliverables: A shell script for using the second unsupervised model and a plan for implementing the third one. | |
Week 9
(27 July - 2 August) |
Implement the third unsupervised model. |
Week 10
(3 August - 9 August) |
Solve issues related to the developed models. |
Week 11-12
(10 August - 26 August) |
Write the required documentation and merge the code into Apertium's repositories. |
Final evaluation |