Difference between revisions of "User:Mary.szmary/proposal2017"
Mary.szmary (talk | contribs) |
Mary.szmary (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
There is also [https://github.com/jonorthwash/ud-annotatrix a project] aimed to make a toolkit for working with dependency trees in Apertium. At the moment, it allows to visualize the trees (the interface works with three annotation formats, namely CONLL-U, CG3 and SD). |
There is also [https://github.com/jonorthwash/ud-annotatrix a project] aimed to make a toolkit for working with dependency trees in Apertium. At the moment, it allows to visualize the trees (the interface works with three annotation formats, namely CONLL-U, CG3 and SD). |
||
The aim of my project is to create an easy-to-use, quick and interactive interface tool for UD annotation. The tool should work both online and offline and allow a user to edit the annotation in both graphical and text modes. |
The aim of my project is to create an easy-to-use, quick and interactive interface tool for UD annotation. The tool should work both online and offline and allow a user to edit the annotation in both graphical and text modes. |
||
===A description of how and who it will benefit in society=== |
===A description of how and who it will benefit in society=== |
||
Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
Apertium has a web-interface for visualising syntactic trees written in Java-Script and HTML. ... |
Apertium has a web-interface for visualising syntactic trees written in Java-Script and HTML. ... |
||
===Project plan=== |
|||
The main idea of this project is to |
|||
Here is a [https://app.moqups.com/maryszmary/kTmExSzJ9O/view/page/ad64222d5 mockup] of the interface. |
|||
---- |
---- |
Revision as of 09:21, 29 March 2017
Contents
Contact information
Name: Maria Sheyanova
E-mail: masha.shejanova@gmail.com
IRC: maryszmary
SourceForge: maryszmary
Phone number: +79169223114
Timezone: UTC+3
Why is it that you are interested in the Apertium project?
I have participated in GSoC 2016 with Apertium, which made me involved in this project, this is one of the main reasons why I am interested in contributing to Apertium. Another reason is that, being a linguist, I find it beneficial to develop linguistic tools, and Apertium gives me a good opportunity to do so.
Which of the published tasks are you interested in? What do you plan to do?
I am planning to work on UD-annotatrix. This will include making a user-friendly interface, which would enable linguists to make syntactic annotation quickly and easily.
Reasons why Google and Apertium should sponsor it
Syntactic annotation is blah blah (why it's important). Currently there is an interface for doing syntactic annotation called brat with both online and offline. However, the interface has a number of issues. Firstly, it does not allow a user to edit the source. Secondly, it does not allow to edit tokenisation. Basically, this interface lacks a lot of features that could be very useful for annotation. Finally, it is rather slow.
There is also a project aimed to make a toolkit for working with dependency trees in Apertium. At the moment, it allows to visualize the trees (the interface works with three annotation formats, namely CONLL-U, CG3 and SD). The aim of my project is to create an easy-to-use, quick and interactive interface tool for UD annotation. The tool should work both online and offline and allow a user to edit the annotation in both graphical and text modes.
A description of how and who it will benefit in society
The result of this work is going to be useful for linguists who deal with dependency annotation.
Previous work
Apertium has a web-interface for visualising syntactic trees written in Java-Script and HTML. ...
Project plan
The main idea of this project is to
Here is a mockup of the interface.
Work plan
Overview
post application period
- Understanding the architecture of the existing project
- Improving my knowledge of Java-Script
community bonding period
- Closer examination and evaluation of the tools that can be used:
- blah;
- blah blah blah ;
- Thinking more about the architecture of the app
work period
- 1st month: developing the basic architecture of the interface
- 2nd month: working on increasing the usability and efficiency of the tool
- 3rd month: working on additional features, documentation
Schedule
week 1: thinking through the architecture, writing the skeleton of the project
weeks 2-3:
week 4:
Deliverable #1
week 5-6:
week 7:
week 8:
27 June: midterm evaluations deadline
Deliverable #2
week 9-10:
week 11: testing, fixing bugs
week 12: clean up the code, last fixes, writing documentation
Project completed: a user-friendly interactive annotation interface is ready
List your skills and give evidence of your qualifications
I'm a 4th year bachelor student of Linguistic Faculty in NRU HSE (Russia).
Programming skills: Python (Flask, Django, SQLite, Elasticsearch, nltk, sklearn), Bash, R, Java-Script (not very experienced, but ready to quickly learn).
Other computer skills: HTML, XML, CSS, JSON, deploying python projects on a Ubuntu server
Experience: I already worked on a couple of projects which included making a web-interface. For example, a have written a web-interface for a unified online dictionary of antonyms. The project is written in Flask (Python), HTML and CSS and uses SQLite database. I also have another Flask project, which consists in making online linguistic exercises. Apart from these projects, I am currently working on a larger team project, which is to make a universal linguistic corpus platform. The frameworks used in this project include Elasticsearch (NoSQL db) and Django. We are also going to use JavaScript in it, so, by the end of spring I will be much more experienced with the language.
Natural languages: Russian (native), Polish, English, German, basic knowledge of Indonesian.
Coding challenge: I’ve fixed the #18 issue on the project's github.
List any non-Summer-of-Code plans you have for the Summer
At the beginning of June I will be finishing a project aimed to make a universal corpus platform, but, as the work on that project is mostly going to be done earlier, I do not think, that it will significantly affect my ability to work on the GSoC project. After that, I have no other no-GSoC plans.