Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apertium for Dummies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(dummies?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Quoting a reader: "to say the truth, that isn't apertium for dummies". Well, "Apertium -- an overview" would perhaps be better. But then the dummies page, how to write it? [[User:Trondtr|Trondtr]] ([[User talk:Trondtr|talk]]) 13:24, 1 December 2013 (GMT) |
Quoting a reader: "to say the truth, that isn't apertium for dummies". Well, "Apertium -- an overview" would perhaps be better. But then the dummies page, how to write it? [[User:Trondtr|Trondtr]] ([[User talk:Trondtr|talk]]) 13:24, 1 December 2013 (GMT) |
||
::That's what I said. "How Apertium Works" could be a better idea (you may replace what I wrote there). Also, we will need this to be updated. Simplifying this overview may actually cause inaccuracies and claiming that it's "for Dummies" isn't a good idea usually. [[User:Wei2912|Wei2912]] ([[User talk:Wei2912|talk]]) 13:27, 1 December 2013 (GMT) |
|||
Revision as of 13:27, 1 December 2013
For Dummies
Quoting a reader: "to say the truth, that isn't apertium for dummies". Well, "Apertium -- an overview" would perhaps be better. But then the dummies page, how to write it? Trondtr (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2013 (GMT)
- That's what I said. "How Apertium Works" could be a better idea (you may replace what I wrote there). Also, we will need this to be updated. Simplifying this overview may actually cause inaccuracies and claiming that it's "for Dummies" isn't a good idea usually. Wei2912 (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2013 (GMT)
