Difference between revisions of "PMC proposals/Supporting open formats on the mailing list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ' ==Summary== As an free/open-source project run by people who support free/open-source software, we should take a stand by only allowing open formats on the mailing list. Propo…') |
(cat) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{TOCD}} |
||
+ | |||
+ | =2011/04/05 #3: Supporting open formats on the mailing list= |
||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="background-color: #e6e6e0; margin: 4px; padding: 4px; border: 1px dotted black"> |
||
+ | '''Proposal expired, please do not modify.''' |
||
==Summary== |
==Summary== |
||
Line 6: | Line 12: | ||
Proposed by: [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] |
Proposed by: [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] |
||
− | Seconded by: |
+ | Seconded by: [[User:Mlforcada|Mlforcada]] |
==In detail== |
==In detail== |
||
− | Posts with the following formats would be rejected from the mailing list: .doc, .docx, .pptx, .ppt, .xls, .xlsx |
+ | Posts with the following formats would be rejected from the mailing list: .doc, .docx, .pptx, .ppt, .xls, .xlsx, .xlsm, .pptx, .pptm |
In order to add further formats to be rejected, a new proposal will need to be made. |
In order to add further formats to be rejected, a new proposal will need to be made. |
||
Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
''Comments on the proposal are welcome. Please sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'' |
''Comments on the proposal are welcome. Please sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'' |
||
+ | |||
+ | * Why don't we reject closed formats as a whole? Is it really necessary to list all the formats? I will support this proposal, but I would like it to be more generic to avoid having to have a new proposal to avoid further closed formats. --[[User:Fsanchez|fsanchez]] 08:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | ** It's easier to have a list, than to define what is open/closed. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 08:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Voting== |
==Voting== |
||
− | Please note that voting is only open to PMC members. Please vote by signing (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>) in the relevant |
+ | Please note that voting is only open to PMC members. Please vote by signing (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>) in the relevant section |
===Accept=== |
===Accept=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Accept''' [[User:Mlforcada|Mlforcada]] |
||
+ | * '''Accept''' [[User:Fsanchez|fsanchez]] |
||
+ | * '''Accept''' [[User:Japerez|Japerez]] |
||
===Disagree=== |
===Disagree=== |
||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | </div> |
||
+ | [[Category:Project Management Committee]] |
Latest revision as of 22:19, 3 August 2013
2011/04/05 #3: Supporting open formats on the mailing list[edit]
Proposal expired, please do not modify.
Summary[edit]
As an free/open-source project run by people who support free/open-source software, we should take a stand by only allowing open formats on the mailing list.
Proposed by: Francis Tyers
Seconded by: Mlforcada
In detail[edit]
Posts with the following formats would be rejected from the mailing list: .doc, .docx, .pptx, .ppt, .xls, .xlsx, .xlsm, .pptx, .pptm
In order to add further formats to be rejected, a new proposal will need to be made.
Comments[edit]
Comments on the proposal are welcome. Please sign your comments using ~~~~
- Why don't we reject closed formats as a whole? Is it really necessary to list all the formats? I will support this proposal, but I would like it to be more generic to avoid having to have a new proposal to avoid further closed formats. --fsanchez 08:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- It's easier to have a list, than to define what is open/closed. - Francis Tyers 08:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Voting[edit]
Please note that voting is only open to PMC members. Please vote by signing (~~~) in the relevant section