Difference between revisions of "Post-generator"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'Many languages use a post-generator FST to fix minor orthographical issues. This FST is in lttoolbox format and is run by <code>lt-proc</code> with the <code>-p</code> or <co…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Many languages use a post-generator FST to fix minor orthographical issues. This FST is in [[lttoolbox]] format and is run by <code>lt-proc</code> with the <code>-p</code> or <code>--post-generation</code> switch. An example of such an orthographical issue is the "a" vs "an" difference in English. The english generator will output <code>~a</code>, and the post-generation FST changes that to a or an depending on the following word.
Many languages use a '''post-generator''' FST to fix minor orthographical issues. This FST is in [[lttoolbox]] format and is run by <code>lt-proc</code> with the <code>-p</code> or <code>--post-generation</code> switch. An example of such an orthographical issue is the "a" vs "an" difference in English. The english generator will output <code>~a</code>, and the post-generation FST changes that to a or an depending on the following word.




[[Category:Lttoolbox]]
[[Category:Morphological analysers]]
[[Category:Documentation in English]]

Revision as of 09:58, 12 May 2013

Many languages use a post-generator FST to fix minor orthographical issues. This FST is in lttoolbox format and is run by lt-proc with the -p or --post-generation switch. An example of such an orthographical issue is the "a" vs "an" difference in English. The english generator will output ~a, and the post-generation FST changes that to a or an depending on the following word.