Difference between revisions of "Java port of Apertium runtime"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Redirected page to Lttoolbox-java) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Lttoolbox-java]] |
|||
A "Java port" of Apertium would enable use on |
|||
* Windows, |
|||
* J2ME/Android phones, |
|||
* web pages (applets), |
|||
* desktop application, |
|||
* Java server applications. |
|||
The last 2 is relevant as, for example an OpenOffice.org plugin should be platform independent to be maintainable. |
|||
AFAIK we havent seen anyone embedding Apertium in a desktop application. Currently Apertium is usable in a local subdir but installation isnt trivial to an end user, but note that 'embedding' something isnt the same as 'using a locally installed version'. |
|||
Having a packaged easy-to-use version of Apertium ready for embedding MT in a larger program would be very cool. |
|||
Ideally should a self-contained Apertium JAR file, only dependent on JRE and an additional JAR file per language pair. |
|||
An "embedding" approach is to use a client stub to an [[Apertium web service]], but there can be reasons why people prefers to have things installed locally (we don't need to repeat them here). |
|||
Missing for a complete port of apertium in java is tagger, piping/modes, interchunk/postchunk and format handling. |
|||
Af I see it: |
|||
* Interchunk/postchunk I could do in very short time, so I could mentor this |
|||
* Tagger: The C++ code is there and some has already been ported to Java ([[lttoolbox-java]] parts), probably someone could port it relatively easy, if someone understanding tagger would co-mentor that part. I'd say its not necessary to port tagger training, just the core (bigram) tagging during translation. |
|||
* Piping/modes isnt too hard. |
|||
* Format handling: I'd say that it would be OK just to be able to handle normal text. |
|||
--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]] 08:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Source code == |
|||
Source code is here: http://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/apertium/trunk/lttoolbox-java/ |
|||
== Interestede people == |
|||
By #apertium IRC chat name: |
|||
* chy - Danish student Moffassal Hossain |
|||
* Kanmuri - ??? |
|||
* Zerocool1989 |
|||
* keshan |
|||
* ... |
|||
== Random snippets of information, that someone might find usefull but noone cared to organize yet == |
|||
<pre> |
|||
<Unhammer> I _think_ those days are OK with me |
|||
<jacobEo> Zerocool1989: please co-ordinate with jimregan as he's also working on the code. |
|||
<jacobEo> Zerocool1989: I think you first have to try to use a lang par with interchunk and postchunk |
|||
* sioraiocht (~tomh@unaffiliated/sioraiocht) has joined #apertium |
|||
<Zerocool1989> ok |
|||
<Zerocool1989> where can i get the interchunk code |
|||
<jacobEo> 1 sec |
|||
<jacobEo> esperanto/apertium/apertium/apertium/interchunk.cc |
|||
<jacobEo> sorry |
|||
<jacobEo> apertium dir in SVN + /apertium/interchunk.cc |
|||
<jacobEo> but Zerocool1989 (and Kanmuri? ) you should compare with esperanto/apertium/apertium/apertium/transfer.cc |
|||
<jacobEo> and the Java transfer |
|||
<jacobEo> is working very differently |
|||
<jacobEo> actually, I think the best thing would be not to care about interchunk and postchunk for now, I can probably do them very fast |
|||
<jacobEo> better would be to help jimregan on the tagger work. |
|||
<jacobEo> and to sort out the modes/piping |
|||
<jacobEo> interchunk and postchunk is also only for 3+ - stage transfer. There are language pairs that only have 1 stage. |
|||
<jacobEo> so another thing that could be done is to try out an 1-stage lang pair (e.g. nn-nb) and see if you can get the parts running in Java |
|||
</pre> |
|||
See also this thread: [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20cf28cd1003080815x56dd1969h229c3f1c7c2e81e2%40mail.gmail.com] |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:47, 5 March 2012
Redirect to:
