Difference between revisions of "Java port of Apertium runtime"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Redirected page to Lttoolbox-java)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[Lttoolbox-java]]
A "Java port" of Apertium would enable use on

* Windows,
* J2ME/Android phones,
* web pages (applets),
* desktop application,
* Java server applications.

The last 2 is relevant as, for example an OpenOffice.org plugin should be platform independent to be maintainable.

AFAIK we havent seen anyone embedding Apertium in a desktop application. Currently Apertium is usable in a local subdir but installation isnt trivial to an end user, but note that 'embedding' something isnt the same as 'using a locally installed version'.

Having a packaged easy-to-use version of Apertium ready for embedding MT in a larger program would be very cool.
Ideally should a self-contained Apertium JAR file, only dependent on JRE and/or a JAR file per language pair.

An "embedding" approach is to use a client stub to an [[Apertium web service]], but there can be reasons why people prefers to have things installed locally (we don't need to repeat them here).


Missing for a complete port of apertium in java is tagger, piping/modes, interchunk/postchunk and format handling.


Af I see it:
* Interchunk/postchunk I could do in very short time, so I could mentor this
* Tagger: The C++ code is there and some has already been ported to Java (lttoolbox parts), probably someone could port it relatively easy, if someone understanding tagger would co-mentor that part. I'd say its not necessary to port tagger training, just the core (bigram) tagging during translation.
* Piping/modes isnt too hard.
* Format handling: I'd say that it would be OK just to be able to handle normal text.

--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]] 08:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:47, 5 March 2012

Redirect to: