Difference between revisions of "Development ideas for dictionary format"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'The idea of this page is to collect ideas for how to expand the Apertium <code>.dix</code> format such that it could be a drop-in replacement for lexc. Currently it has many …') |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Flags == |
== Flags == |
||
== Phonology == |
|||
== Further reading == |
|||
* Anssi Yli-Jyrä (2011) "Explorations on Positionwise Flag Diacritics in Finite-State Morphology". NODALIDA |
|||
** This paper adds flag diacritics for implementing morphophonology to a single-tape (e.g. like lttoolbox, no intersect/compose) finite-state transducer. |
|||
[[Category:Development]] |
[[Category:Development]] |
Revision as of 11:21, 27 December 2011
The idea of this page is to collect ideas for how to expand the Apertium .dix
format such that it could be a drop-in replacement for lexc. Currently it has many advantages over lexc: Convenient / easy validation, more restrictive syntax, support for multiword queues. The problem is that it doesn't support some useful features that lexc has, or not comfortably.
Archiphonemes
Perhaps use entities ?
The option of just using <s>
is pretty much out,
<e><p><l><s n="pron"/></l><r><s n="L"/><s n="A"/><s n="G"/><s n="I"/></r></p><par n="CASE"/></e>
For
%<pron%>:%>%{L%}%{I%}%{K%}%{I%} CASE ;
Something like:
<e><p><l><s n="pron"/></l><r>&L;&A;&G;&I;</r></p><par n="CASE"/></e>
Might be liveable ? These would then be converted by the compiler into {L}{A}{G}{I}
tags ?
Morpheme boundary
Current tags:
<a>
= "alarm"<s>
= "symbol"<b>
= "blank"<j>
= "join"<g>
= "group"
It's desirable that it be a single letter.
Available: c d f h k m n o q t u v w x y z
Flags
Phonology
Further reading
- Anssi Yli-Jyrä (2011) "Explorations on Positionwise Flag Diacritics in Finite-State Morphology". NODALIDA
- This paper adds flag diacritics for implementing morphophonology to a single-tape (e.g. like lttoolbox, no intersect/compose) finite-state transducer.